Exam SY0-701 topic 1 question 206 discussion

Why not e: "All to Above" jajajaj

Why not Sanctions?

Regulatory fines are usually significant and have a clear financial impact on the company, making them a compelling reason to allocate more resources for compliance. Reputational damage is also a serious consequence, but its effect is a bit indirect, resulting from, say, data breaches or public knowledge of non-compliance. It can be harder to quantify and justify immediately compared to direct financial penalties.

Hit the executives where it hurts most.

Fines: Under GDPR, fines can be substantial, reaching up to 4% of a company's global annual turnover. This makes them a very direct and immediate consequence of non-compliance, emphasizing the financial risk associated with it. Reputational damage: While this remains a significant concern, it may not be as immediately quantifiable as fines. Fines can serve as a concrete measure of the financial impact of non-compliance. Sanctions: Sanctions are typically imposed by governments as a result of serious violations of laws or international agreements. They are not directly related to data privacy compliance. Contractual implications: While non-compliance may have contractual implications, especially if there are specific data privacy clauses in contracts with customers or partners, it's not necessarily the most immediate or significant consequence.

A. Fines are financial consequence of non-compliance with data privacy regulations

A. GPT