Exam SY0-601 topic 1 question 12 discussion

Replacing the traditional key with an RFID key - For this question, there is mention of "attempts have been made to pick the door lock". Out of the options provided, only the option to replace the current door key with an RFID key directly addresses this issue. The other options can be viewed as preventative access control systems/ deterrents as well. ============================ Helpful Info Preventative access control - An access control that is used to stop unwanted or unauthorized activity from occurring, these could be policies, firewalls, physical barriers etc. RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) - A type of key card/fob access control system that uses a radio frequency signals to communicate between a reader and an RFID tag. You would place the tag/card near the reader and if the reader identifies the signal as belonging to an authorized user, they will be allowed access.

B, C and D, are not a access control. So, A is the only XD

Is the answer not B A preventative control is one that prevents specific actions from occurring, such as a mantrap prevents tailgating. Preventative controls act before an event, preventing it from advancing. A firewall is an example of a preventative control, as it can block access to a specific resource.

A. Replacing the traditional key with an RFID key would be the BEST option in this scenario. The use of an RFID key system provides more secure access control than traditional keys, as the keys cannot be duplicated easily, and the access logs are easier to maintain. Additionally, an RFID key system allows the security team to more effectively monitor access to the facility and to limit access to specific areas as necessary. Installing a camera or setting motion-sensing lights would be helpful for monitoring, but they would not necessarily prevent unauthorized access. Surrounding the property with fencing and gates can also help with security, but it would not be the BEST option in this scenario as it does not directly address the issue of the lock being picked.

As said previously, the key to this question is "PREVENTATIVE". CompTIA defines it thus: Preventive—the control acts to eliminate or reduce the likelihood that an attack can succeed. A preventative control operates before an attack can take place. None of the other answers are both preventative, and meet the other terms in the question. However effective they might be to help mitigate the risk.

replacing the traditional key with an RFID key, could also be a viable solution for implementing a stronger preventative access control for the secure facility. This option introduces an electronic access control mechanism that can provide enhanced security compared to traditional keys. By replacing the traditional key with an RFID key, the security engineer can leverage technology to improve access control. RFID keys typically contain a unique identifier that can be scanned by a reader to grant or deny access. This system allows for more granular control over who can enter the facility, as access can be restricted based on the specific RFID key credentials. RFID keys can also offer additional features such as logging access events, enabling centralized access management, and facilitating quick revocation of access in case of lost or stolen keys. These benefits enhance the overall security posture of the facility.

Replacing the traditional key with an RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) key is a stronger form of access control compared to a physical key. RFID keys use radio waves to communicate with an RFID reader, which grants access to the facility if the key is authorized. This technology provides several advantages over traditional keys: 1. Increased security: RFID keys are more difficult to duplicate compared to physical keys, reducing the risk of unauthorized key copying. 2. Access control management: RFID keys can be easily activated or deactivated from the access control system, allowing the security team to grant or revoke access quickly. 3. Audit trail: An RFID access control system can provide an audit trail, showing the times and dates of access attempts, successful entries, and denied entries, which can aid in security investigations.

The correct answer is D. Surrounding the property with fencing and gates To implement a stronger preventative access control in this scenario, surrounding the property with fencing and gates would be the most effective option. This physical security measure creates a physical barrier that prevents unauthorized individuals from even reaching the door, making it much more difficult for someone to attempt to pick the lock or gain access to the secure facility in the first place. While options like replacing the traditional key with an RFID key, installing a camera, and setting motion-sensing lights can enhance security, they primarily address issues after an unauthorized access attempt has been made or are focused on surveillance and identification rather than preventing physical access to the facility. Fencing and gates, on the other hand, provide a proactive and physical deterrent to unauthorized access.

Replacing a traditional key with an RFID key (Option A) is indeed a strong security measure, especially for preventing unauthorized physical access. RFID keys offer enhanced security because they are often more difficult to duplicate or pick compared to traditional keys. This option is a valid choice for improving access control and preventing unauthorized entry. However, the choice between Option A (RFID key) and Option D (fencing and gates) may depend on various factors, including the specific security needs, budget, and the facility's location. If the primary concern is unauthorized physical access at the door, then Option A (RFID key) would be an effective choice. On the other hand, if there are broader security concerns, such as unauthorized access from multiple points or the need to secure the entire perimeter, Option D (fencing and gates) may be the more comprehensive solution. Ultimately, both options (A and D) can enhance security, but the choice may vary depending on the specific security requirements of the facility. I hate it here

A is the correct one!

Nothing else prevents anyone from continuing to pick the lock until they succeed.

Let's focus on some of the keywords which are pick, lock, several attempts, and preventive. And the answer to which solves the task given to the engineer is the RFID. Traditionally, RFID replaces pick-able Keyholes which technically solves the problem.

All answers are access controls. However, only A provides stronger protection for the door itself. The word BEST indicates the test writer wants you to focus on the solution that will fix the door issue.

This address the "traditional key" that is being picked. Replacing with RFID takes out the physical key hole and only authorized users will possess a RFID key to access.

The best option to complete the engineer's assignment of implementing a stronger preventative access control at the door would be: A. Replacing the traditional key with an RFID key. This method directly enhances the security of the door's locking mechanism, making it more difficult for unauthorized persons to gain entry by picking the lock.

I did entertain C: cause I don't know about you guys.. if I am trying to pick a lock and suddenly, I get staged lights shined down on me.. I am getting my arse out of the area!

IMO the option is to add fencing around the perimeter of the facility. Adding an RFID reader is not going to stop the door from being picked any less than it already is. RFID readers provides Authorization and Accounting. If you limit who can be in there with a barrier you’re goal is achieved. Defense in Depth. This should go back to the defense in depth