exam questions

Exam SY0-601 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the SY0-601 exam

Exam SY0-601 topic 1 question 201 discussion

Actual exam question from CompTIA's SY0-601
Question #: 201
Topic #: 1
[All SY0-601 Questions]

Which of the following prevents an employee from seeing a colleague who is visiting an inappropriate website?

  • A. Job rotation policy
  • B. NDA
  • C. AUP
  • D. Separation of duties policy
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
banditring
Highly Voted 2 years, 9 months ago
This is what happens when CompTIA runs out of questions to make up and then they start sounding stupid -_-
upvoted 117 times
Gino_Slim
2 years, 9 months ago
This is the true answer
upvoted 9 times
...
Fiftypeso
1 year, 10 months ago
CompTIA is asking dating questions now
upvoted 24 times
Afel_Null
1 year, 9 months ago
WTF. Seeing as in dating? I thought it meant simply not founding out. If it's dating, than none of the answers, it cannot be done lawfully. If just not seeing, than only physically seperating them would work.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
mark9999
2 years, 8 months ago
Very true. They are so hell bent on changing loads of questions so that the dumps don't work that they make up a lot of ambiguous drivel. There are only so many ways to ask the same concepts.
upvoted 11 times
...
...
Sir_Learnalot
Highly Voted 2 years, 8 months ago
Somtimes I get the feeling CompTIA uses a random sentence generator for their questions -.-
upvoted 46 times
...
csentry007
Most Recent 12 months ago
Selected Answer: A
This one of the stupudist question. I spelled some things wrong just like the grammar in the q. Only thing that can possibly prevent is job rotation so ou do not see what is going on. Whoever writes these q's needs a course in effective written comm.
upvoted 1 times
...
RainSec
1 year ago
Terrible question, neither AUP or SoD inherently PREVENT an employee from viewing the actions of another employee. AUP is a deterrent. It outlines acceptable policies and outlines the consequences of breaking/ignoring these policies. NIST states: There are various types of SOD, an important one is history-based SOD that regulate for example, the same subject (role) cannot access the same object for variable number of times. I guess there could be a scenario in where the two employees are physically separated, and that after the first employee performs their duty, they would not longer be able to access the system until the 2nd employee completes their duty, in which case the 2nd employee could privately visit corn sites before completing their task. Effectively preventing the other employee from viewing the action.
upvoted 1 times
...
toffer96
1 year, 2 months ago
Ugh. I think the answer they are looking for here is AUP. Separation of duties policy... that's more about preventing an employee from getting access to company resources that they're not supposed to have access to rather than an "inappropriate" website. Regardless, this question really should be worded better.
upvoted 1 times
...
mikzer
1 year, 2 months ago
I agree with banditring. Time for a drink.
upvoted 3 times
...
RyanL26
1 year, 3 months ago
Prevent them from seeing what the person is doing on his computer, or seeing the person in general????? I am confused...
upvoted 2 times
...
kewokil120
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D. I'm taking the approach of person x and person y are not web filter admins. Therefor person y can not view what person x did unless person x left their computer unprotected while using the bathroom.
upvoted 4 times
...
_deleteme_
1 year, 5 months ago
C- Why? No looking over someone's shoulder. No shoulder surfing or violating their privacy, or privacy of the company if they are working on something you should not be looking at. AUP defines that policy, whether it is inappropriate or legit. Stupid Question by COMPTIA.
upvoted 1 times
...
cannon
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Separation of Duties is what prevents a application support person from logging into another teams servers (DNS, DHCP or database, etc) as well. It separates what servers each team has admin access to. It's heavily talked about in financial firms that have to comply with FDIC, FFIEC, SOX etc. The only answer that could actually "prevent" someone viewing corn at the PC/laptop level is AUP - Acceptable Use Policy using GPO's or firewall rules.
upvoted 1 times
...
klinkklonk
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Separation of duties doesn't mean that people are physically separated. Just that workloads are divided so that one individual doesn't have too much influence on a project. Two people with separation of duties could still be sat next to each other, just working on different parts of the same project. AUP is the answer.
upvoted 3 times
...
Arpilir
1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: D
AUP does not prevent but deter. Moreover, it applies to the one visiting inappropriate website but not with the colleague from seeing someone doing it.
upvoted 1 times
klinkklonk
1 year, 6 months ago
Separation of duties doesn't mean that people are physically separated. Just that workloads are divided so that one individual doesn't have too much influence on a project. Two people with separation of duties could still be sat next to each other, just working on different parts of the same project. AUP is the answer.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Skeptiker
1 year, 7 months ago
This one is so poorly worded, it's insane. The only two answers I really go between is AUP and Separation of Duties. AUP defines what is acceptable for a user to be doing and consequences for not following the rules, which should've deterred the colleague from accessing an inappropriate site. However, the question states the colleague is accessing the site, so the only thing that fits is separation of duties, implying the other employee wouldn't be in his area or have the same privileges as him to be able to see what he is doing, but that's such a poor explanation.
upvoted 2 times
...
Cloudninja117
1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C. it's while they are both at work at the same time.
upvoted 1 times
...
DirtyDann
1 year, 8 months ago
HALP. IVE FALLEN VICTIM TO COMPTIA SY-601 AND I CANT GET UP
upvoted 19 times
...
[Removed]
1 year, 8 months ago
Like seriously? what question is that? this question does not make any sense to me. and the answer......A B C D
upvoted 3 times
...
Samwalker
1 year, 9 months ago
Guys, its D. Its asking what can prevent someone from seeing someone else watch something inappropriate. Basically what prevents you from knowing that I'm watching corn at work. It won't be AUP. If the work is separated, you won't know if im watching corn or not
upvoted 4 times
csentry007
12 months ago
Using that logic, wouldn't job rotation potentially separate 2 bodies.
upvoted 1 times
...
klinkklonk
1 year, 6 months ago
It doesn't mean that people are physically separated. Just that workloads are divided so that one individual doesn't have too much influence on a project. Two people with separation of duties could still be sat next to each other, just working on different parts of the same project.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...