Exam CAS-004 topic 1 question 170 discussion

Going with C. When using a SaaS solution, the company entrusts the service provider with its data and relies on the service provider to maintain and protect that data. If the company decides to switch to a different service provider in the future, it is important to ensure that it can obtain its data in a timely and secure manner. If the company is unable to obtain its data when migrating to another service, it could result in significant disruption to its business operations and could lead to financial losses.

i'm going with D, cause now you can't test out the environement and know the vulnerabilities + you won't have full control on the system

B. The inability to require the service provider process data in a specific country Explanation: When adopting a SaaS solution, one of the most significant risks involves data sovereignty and compliance. If the service provider is unable to process data in a specific country (or within a region that complies with local regulations like GDPR), it could expose the company to regulatory and legal risks. This is especially critical if the company operates in jurisdictions with strict data privacy laws or industry-specific compliance requirements.

I don't think it's C and I'm leaning towards D. Here's why it can't be C: The inability to obtain company data when migrating to another service is a risk related to data portability and vendor lock-in. While this can be a significant challenge, many regions have laws and best practices in place that require service providers to ensure data portability (e.g., GDPR's right to data portability). Additionally, this risk can often be mitigated through contractual agreements with the provider.

It is not D. CSP usually let you perform security assessments against them, to provide transparency and to convince you to onboard with them. They do this by providing you security documentations, educational resources, third-party audits, certifications. C should be the answer. Using AI-based SaaS solution can cause Vendor lock-in. If the SaaS provider is using proprietary technologies, they might make it challenging for you to export your own data to another provider

I think C and D are both good choices, but i think not being able to obtain data during migration is a HUGE concern verses a security assessment

The inability to conduct security assessments against a service provider (Option D) is often considered a more critical risk in the early stages of adopting a new SaaS solution. Security assessments allow an organization to evaluate the service provider's security practices, assess potential vulnerabilities, and ensure compliance with security standards. This knowledge is fundamental in understanding and mitigating security risks associated with adopting a new service. While data portability and the ability to access company data during migration (Option C) are important aspects to consider, security and the assurance of a secure environment through proper assessments are typically given higher priority due to the potential risks posed by unknown or inadequately secured SaaS solutions. Therefore, the inability to conduct security assessments against the service provider is often considered the GREATEST risk in adopting a new SaaS solution, particularly concerning security and risk management.

Most SaaS solutions I deal with allow you to export your data and often even configurations. What I can't do is run my own security assessments against their infrastructure.

While each of the answers points is a valid concern, D. The inability to conduct security assessments against a service provider could be considered the "GREATEST" risk because it impacts the core security posture of the company. If a company cannot verify the security measures of its service providers, it could inadvertently expose itself to a wide range of threats, from data breaches to regulatory fines. Furthermore, security breaches could lead to reputational damage, loss of customer trust, and financial repercussions

A -The customer still manages access controls B - The SLA or data governance can determine where date is stored and processed C - Adopting a SaaS can lead to vendor lock-in, especially with using a new/novel technology like AI. D - Many companies offer security assessments on SaaS. Inversion6, Cyber Security Works, and LeanIX are just a few from a quick google search. Answer is C.

SaaS solutions are expected to do all of their security assessments themselves according to regulatory guidance and signed SLA. (Just like any other SaaS) However, the most important asset to a company other than $$ is its data. Therefore C is the answer. Acess controls still can be managed by the company so it is NOT A. The SLA can most certainly stipulate any geographical concerns of where the data goes. NOT B Source: Verifying each answer against Chat GPT, my experience, other test banks, a written book, and weighing in the discussion from all users to create a 100% accurate guide for myself before I take the exam. (It isn't easy because of the time needed, but it is doing my diligence)

D. The inability to conduct security assessments against a service provider would be the greatest risk in adopting this solution. While all the options could be potential risks, the inability to conduct security assessments could leave the company unaware of any vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the SaaS solution. This could lead to a security breach or compromise of sensitive company data. Therefore, it is important to ensure the ability to conduct security assessments against a service provider is included in the contractual agreement.

While the inability to conduct security assessments against a service provider is indeed a risk when adopting a SaaS solution, it may not be the greatest risk in comparison to other risks. In many cases, SaaS providers have their own security assessment processes and are often required to comply with industry standards or certifications, which can help ensure a certain level of security. However, the inability to obtain company data when migrating to another service (option C) can have more severe consequences, such as data loss, increased costs, and delays in business operations. This risk can directly impact the company's core business processes and data, making it a greater risk to consider when adopting a new SaaS solution.

Going with C. To rule out D (security assessments)..you may not be able to perform certain types of assements, such as penetration tests against the SaaS, but you could still assess the security posture through other means.

answer could be C or D, but I am leaning towards C because of the keywords "data analytics" , "AI".

The inability to conduct security assessments against the service provider poses the most severe risk. While option C is a risk, data migration issues can often be mitigated through contractual agreements, data backup strategies, and implementing proper data management practices.

"any future risks" if the company cannot migrated data to another provider for whatever reason....that would become an issue. I'll go with C.