A junior administrator is setting up a new Linux server that is intended to be used as a router at a remote site. Which of the following parameters will accomplish this goal?
They don't mention the purpose of the NAT, so keep it simple for the "entry level" exam. With the most common form of NAT or IP Masquerading, post-routing alters packets as they leave the system.
Option C. did execute without errors:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
#
So I'm with LRISB, C is the correct answer
Option B is the correct one: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
This command does two things:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward enables IP forwarding, which is necessary for the server to forward packets between interfaces.
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE sets up NAT (Network Address Translation) so that packets leaving the eth0 interface will have their source IP address replaced with the IP address of the eth0 interface (i.e., the IP address of the server). This is necessary for the server to act as a router.
Option A is incorrect because it uses PREROUTING instead of POSTROUTING. The PREROUTING chain is used for DNAT (Destination NAT), not for SNAT (Source NAT) which is what we want in this case.
The iptables command "-t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE" configures NAT on the server. It adds a rule to the nat table in iptables that performs source NAT (SNAT) on outgoing packets. The "-o eth0" option specifies the outgoing interface (eth0 in this case), and "-j MASQUERADE" instructs iptables to modify the source IP address of outgoing packets to match the IP address of the interface, effectively masquerading the internal IP addresses.
Options a and d are incorrect because they use the PREROUTING chain in iptables, which is used for modifying packets as they enter the system. In the context of setting up a router, we need to modify packets as they leave the system, so we should use the POSTROUTING chain.
Option b is incorrect because it uses the "-D" flag, which stands for "delete," to remove a rule from iptables. However, in this case, we need to add a rule to configure NAT, not delete an existing rule.
Therefore, the correct answer is
C. echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
Explanation:
The first command (echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward) enables IP forwarding on the Linux server, allowing it to forward packets from one interface to another.
The second command (iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE) uses iptables to set up Network Address Translation (NAT), which will allow the Linux server to act as a router and forward traffic between the external network and the internal network. The "-o eth0" option specifies the outgoing interface, and the "-j MASQUERADE" option sets up MASQUERADE NAT, which dynamically assigns IP addresses to internal network clients as they make outbound connections.
Option A (echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward and iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -j MASQUERADE) is not preferred because it only enables IP forwarding and NAT (network address translation) for incoming traffic on the eth0 interface. This may not be sufficient for routing all the traffic from a remote site.
In a real-world scenario, the router would need to route traffic for both incoming and outgoing traffic. Option C (echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward and iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE) is more complete as it enables IP forwarding and NAT for both incoming and outgoing traffic on the eth0 interface.
I think the answer is A, as with IP forwarding and PREROUTING, both modifying the packet as it arrives from outside the private LAN, and altering the destination address to a preconfigured mapping
I picked `A` because its a "remote system" and taking in packets to route which is -i for the "in" interface and the "prerouting". And it's implying the there needs to be traffic between both remote sites.
Thanks i read it, i believe you need both a prerouting rule and a postrouting rule:
prerouting is incoming packages.
postrouting is outgoing packets to other networks.
so -i should be used for "in" which would be prerouting.
and -o should be used for "out" which would be posting routing.
i'm sticking to A,
3 weeks ago someone made a comment that they got 60 out of 63 on the test, so most of the questions i'm thinking are correct, just something thats one the back of my mind.
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.XK0-005 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
e418137
9 months agoBryanSME
11 months agoDRVision
11 months agoLKRISB
1 year, 5 months agoLKRISB
1 year, 5 months agoBreakOff874
1 year, 8 months agolinux_admin
1 year, 8 months agolinux_admin
1 year, 8 months agoCkl22
1 year, 10 months agoNvoid
1 year, 11 months agoTheRealManish
1 year, 11 months agoTheRealManish
1 year, 11 months agoNvoid
1 year, 11 months agoTheRealManish
1 year, 11 months agoTheRealManish
2 years agoNvoid
1 year, 11 months ago