Exam XK0-005 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the XK0-005 exam

Exam XK0-005 topic 1 question 113 discussion

Actual exam question from CompTIA's XK0-005

Question #: 113
Topic #: 1

A systems technician is working on deploying several microservices to various RPM-based systems, some of which could run up to two hours. Which of the following commands will allow the technician to execute those services and continue deploying other microservices within the same terminal section?

A. gedit & disown
B. kill 9 %1
C. fg %1
D. bg %1 job name

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

by Nvoid at Nov. 25, 2022, 6:01 a.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

angellorv

8 months, 4 weeks ago

Answer A: bg puts existing running processes in the background; while "& disown" sends the process to the bg upon execution which is what the question is implying. "...execute those services and continue deploying other microservices within the same terminal section? gedit - has nothing to do with the question or answer it's just the command used in the answer (bad choice); imagine answer A as: job name & disown

upvoted 3 times

...

linux_admin

10 months, 3 weeks ago

Selected Answer: D

D. bg %1 job name: This command puts the job associated with job ID %1 in the background and allows the technician to continue deploying other microservices in the same terminal session. The job name argument is optional and allows the technician to specify a custom name for the job. This option is suitable for the scenario described in the question. A. gedit & disown: This command opens the gedit text editor in the background and disowns it so that it is no longer associated with the terminal. This option is not relevant to deploying microservices and would not allow the technician to continue deploying other microservices in the same terminal session.

upvoted 2 times

...

KnifeClown1

10 months, 4 weeks ago

Selected Answer: D

D. bg %1 job name The command bg %1 job name will allow the technician to execute the microservice in the background, allowing them to continue deploying other microservices within the same terminal session. The bg command stands for "background" and it is used to run a job in the background. The %1 is a job specifier, which specifies the job to be run in the background, and "job name" is the name given to the job. This allows the technician to keep the microservice running even after they have closed the terminal session.

upvoted 1 times

...

Pinnubhai

12 months ago

Selected Answer: D

Answer D is the closest. A doesnt make any sense as what gedit will help in all this.

upvoted 4 times

...

Ckl22

1 year ago

Selected Answer: D

D is the only one that makes the most sense. "bg %n" where n is the job ID, will send that job to process in the background, and all interaction with the current shell.

upvoted 2 times

...

lo_01234_ol

1 year, 1 month ago

Selected Answer: A

Scroll down to #5: https://www.baeldung.com/linux/detach-process-from-terminal

upvoted 1 times

TheRealManish

1 year, 1 month ago

disown is fine, but what does gedit have to do with anything?

upvoted 3 times

...

Nvoid

1 year, 1 month ago

Selected Answer: D

put the jobs in the background process!

upvoted 1 times

TheRealManish

1 year, 1 month ago

it's hard to say.. bg%1 job name - is not a valid command.. i meant it works, but thats because the command ignores the job name. also, the qiestion says there are multiple jobs and the %1 would just background one of the jobs. But then, B and C are obviously wrong. as for A, what the hell does gedit have to do with anything? ugh.. i guess D it is?

upvoted 1 times

Nvoid

1 year, 1 month ago

best answer out of the worst of all possibilities. I'll come back around leave a comment after i pass.

upvoted 1 times

Nvoid

1 year, 1 month ago

i came back around, but didn't take the test yet, i get what you're saying now about: bg%1 and bg%1 job_name being the same command, hard to say.. nothing changed for me, terrible question or mis-worded?

upvoted 1 times

...