While reviewing a cyber-risk assessment, an analyst notes there are concerns related to FPGA usage. Which of the following statements would BEST convince the analyst's supervisor to use additional controls?
A.
FPGAs are expensive and can only be programmed once. Code deployment safeguards are needed.
B.
FPGAs have an inflexible architecture; Additional training for developers is needed.
C.
FPGAs are vulnerable to malware installation and require additional protections for their codebase.
D.
FPGAs are expensive to produce. Anti-counterfeiting safeguards are needed.
ChatGPT:
To convince the analyst's supervisor to use additional controls for FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) usage in the context of a cyber-risk assessment, it's essential to highlight the specific risks and potential consequences associated with FPGA usage. Here's a statement that can help persuade the supervisor:
"Utilizing additional controls for FPGA usage is critical due to the following concerns:
Data Integrity and Confidentiality: FPGAs are highly flexible and can be reconfigured to perform various functions. However, this flexibility also introduces the risk of unintentional misconfigurations or malicious alterations that could compromise data integrity and confidentiality. Additional controls can help ensure that FPGA designs and configurations are securely managed and validated to prevent unauthorized access or data breaches.
Field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) are integrated circuits that can be configured to perform different functions. This makes them versatile and adaptable, but it also makes them vulnerable to malware. Malware can be inserted into the FPGA's codebase during the configuration process, and it can then be used to control the FPGA's functionality.
FPGAs attacks often require physical access and are difficult to find open source hacker tools because these circuits are very customized, which explains of why they are expensive. Going with D here.
Agree. Additionally, FPGAs are particularly vulnerable to counterfeiting because they contain programmable logic that can be used for a variety of purposes, and can be difficult to authenticate and verify due to the complexity of the devices and the lack of standard testing methods.
your own linke starts with
"A newly disclosed vulnerability in older Xilinx FPGAs can be exploited to simplify the process of extracting and decrypting the encrypted bitstreams used to configure the chips."
yet you vote D lol
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CS0-002 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
opem
Highly Voted 2 years, 2 months agoNerdAlert
2 years, 1 month agodhdrmns
1 year, 6 months agokumax
Most Recent 1 year, 7 months agonaleenh
1 year, 8 months agodb97
2 years, 3 months ago2Fish
2 years, 1 month agoCatoFong
2 years, 3 months agoj0n45
2 years, 4 months agoBubu3k
1 year, 9 months agobob12356
2 years, 5 months agomarc4354345
2 years, 5 months ago