In comparison to other types of alternative processing sites that may be invoked as a part of disaster recovery, cold sites are different because they:
A.
have basic utility coverage, including power and water.
B.
provide workstations and read-only domain controllers.
C.
are generally the least costly to sustain.
D.
are the quickest way to restore business.
E.
are geographically separated from the company's primary facilities.
FROM THE CASP STUDENT BOOK
2. Which type of DR site has lowest operating expense and complexity?
Cold Site
Cold Site
A cold site is one that requires the least amount of maintenance. In the most
general sense, a cold site is simply a facility that is under the organization’s control
but does not have any pre-established information system capability. It is literally
a site that has electricity but no computer equipment, perhaps not even any
furniture, but it is open and available for use. A cold site has the lowest operating
expense and complexity at the cost of activation time—a cold site will take weeks
to activate as all the equipment must be acquired and provisioned before it can
be used.
SAYS NOTHING ABOUT WATER.
The question is pretty much asking what distinguishes a cold site from the other ones.
simple: it's generally the least expensive to sustain
Can't be A because basic utility coverage also exist within warm and hot sites
Cold Sites:
Characteristics:
Cold sites are facilities that are not pre-equipped with the necessary IT infrastructure, servers, or systems needed for day-to-day operations.
They do not have live data or up-to-date configurations.
Cold sites may only have basic facilities, such as power and space, without the actual IT equipment.
Activation Time:
Cold sites have the longest activation time among the three types. It may take days or even weeks to set up the necessary hardware, install software, and restore data.
Cost:
Cold sites are relatively cost-effective compared to warm and hot sites. The organization pays for the facility and basic infrastructure but saves on maintaining a fully operational IT environment.
Use Case:
Cold sites are suitable for organizations with less critical applications or those that can afford longer downtimes. They are often chosen by organizations with a lower tolerance for recovery time objectives (RTOs).
I believe the answer that we're going for here is C.
For example, how would a hot site or a warm site operate without power service?
The main thing that is drilled into your head when learning this is:
Cold sites are where you just have a site picked out and paid for, and it's the cheapest.
Warm sites are in between a hot and cold site.
Hot sites are almost exact replicas of your prod, where you can "flip a switch" and move.
Mobile sites are basically a camper.
Cold sites are different because they: have basic utility coverage, including power and water. <-That doesn't make them different, all sites has these.
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CAS-004 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
FOURDUE
Highly Voted 2 years, 3 months agoBreza
2 years, 3 months agoEAlonso
Most Recent 10 months, 3 weeks agotalosDevbot
1 year, 4 months agoDelab202
1 year, 4 months agoGeofab
2 years, 2 months agosplink
2 years, 2 months agoripper69
2 years, 2 months agoOneSaint
2 years, 3 months agoOneSaint
2 years, 4 months ago