Get Unlimited Contributor Access to the all ExamTopics Exams!
Take advantage of PDF Files for 1000+ Exams along with community discussions and pass IT Certification Exams Easily.
The main difference between XSS and CSRF can be summarized as follows:
XSS involves injecting and executing malicious scripts in a victim's browser when interacting with a compromised website, while CSRF tricks the victim's browser into performing unwanted actions on a target website where the victim is authenticated.
XSS exploits the vulnerability in the website's input validation and output encoding, while CSRF exploits the trust between the user's browser and the target website.
XSS impacts the user's browser, while CSRF impacts the target website and its users.
https://brightsec.com/blog/cross-site-scripting-php/
What is Cross-Site Scripting?
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks are a form of injection attack, where malicious scripts are injected into trusted web applications.
XSS is usually inserted through a website using a hyperlink or a web form. The inserted code can be used via any client-side language such as JavaScript, PHP, HTML.
And the URL for the page becomes
https://example.com/school/?group=beginner
Injecting the following code into the URL enables an XSS attack:
https://example.com/school/?group=window.location=”https://maliciouswebsite.com”
The first log entry shows that a user or an automated script made a GET request to the URL http://www.example.com/profile.php?id=3cscript%203ealert%20288271%2527%29%3Cscript%3e. The URL contains encoded characters, which suggests that an attacker may have attempted to exploit a vulnerability in the web application. The HTTP response code is 200, which means the request was successful, and the server returned a response with a size of 11705 bytes.
The second log entry shows that a user or an automated script made a GET request to the URL http://www.example.com/profile.php?id=3cscript%3ealert*28%27http%3a%2f%2fwww.evilsite.com%2fupdater.php%27%29%3cscript%203e. This URL also contains encoded characters, and it appears to be an attempt to execute a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack. The HTTP response code is 200, and the server returned a response with a size of 23713 bytes.
Based on this information, it's possible that the web application is vulnerable to XSS attacks, and an attacker may have attempted to exploit this vulnerability. As a security analyst, you should investigate the vulnerability and take appropriate steps to mitigate the risk of further attacks.
can it not be CSSF
Yes, it is possible that the attempted attack is a Cross-Site Script Forgery (CSRF) attack instead of an XSS attack. The log entries alone do not provide enough information to definitively determine the type of attack.
However, there are a few reasons to suspect that the attack is an XSS attack rather than a CSRF attack. Firstly, the URLs in the log entries appear to contain encoded characters that are commonly used in XSS attacks, such as <script> and %27. Secondly, the URLs are accessing a profile.php page with a parameter called id, which is often a target of XSS attacks. Finally, the attacker is attempting to execute JavaScript code in the URL, which is typically associated with XSS attacks.
That being said, it is important to perform a thorough investigation to determine the exact type of attack and take appropriate measures to mitigate the vulnerability.
The clue lies in the URL parameters id=1, id=2, and id=3 appended to the website address. This pattern often indicates that the attacker is trying to manipulate the SQL query by injecting SQL code into the parameter values to gain unauthorized access to the database or perform other malicious actions.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
B. SQLi
(%cscript%3eatert%28%271%27%29%3script%3e and %27 http%3a%2f%2fwww.evilsite.com%2fupdater.php%27%29%3script%3e) indicates an attempt to execute malicious scripts within the profile.php page. This is a common technique used in XSS attacks to execute arbitrary code or redirect users to malicious websites
If this was CSRF attack it could have been like quite similar pattern: /profile.php?id=<img src="http://www.evilsite.com/attack-script">
The attacker might embed an "img" tag with a source pointing to a script hosted on the attacker's site. This script could perform an action like changing the user's account settings or initiating a transaction on another website where the user is already authenticated. Hope this helps. In this context based on my reseach answer is XSS which is D
(%cscript%3eatert%28%271%27%29%3script%3e) into the URL parameter id of the /profile.php request. The injected code is obfuscated using URL encoding.
This indicates an attempt to exploit a vulnerability in the web application to execute malicious scripts within users' browsers. This aligns with the definition of a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack, where the attacker injects scripts that are executed by other users when they view the affected page.
The presence of the URL http%3a%2f%2fwww.evilsite.com%2fupdater.php in the second request does not necessarily indicate CSRF. It could be part of the injected script trying to load content from an external site as part of the attack. CSRF typically involves tricking users into unknowingly performing actions within the application they are authenticated in, not loading external content.
XSS seems to be the go here. XSRF requires the payload to be sent to a user in order to get them to click/process a malicious link but there is no such interaction in this case.
XSS vs CSRF - What Is The Difference?
Now that the basic understanding of these two vulnerabilities is clear, let’s talk about the differences that these two shares:
XSS is a two-way attack while CSRF is only one-way. In XSS, threat actors can execute a code, receive a response, and forward it to the desired destination whereas CSRF allows attackers only to raise a corrupted HTTP request.
XSS is JavaScript-based while CSRF is HTTP-based.
The success of an XSS attack isn’t based on the session activation. Corrupted payloads are delivered whenever the user accesses the website. CSRF demands an active session be completed.
The scope of CSRF attacks is limited. At max, it leads to accessing corrupted websites or clicking on malicious links. The reach of XSS is far-flung and permits attackers to do anything they want.
About XSS vs CSRF attacks, one key point is the way they both store the trouble-causing code. The code is stored on the targeted website in an XSS attack while it’s stored on the 3rd party site for carrying out a CSRF attack.
The attacker in the provided log lines is attempting to exploit a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.
XSS involves injecting malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users, typically through user input fields. In the log lines, the attacker is attempting to inject a script by modifying the "id" parameter in the URL, specifically within the "profile.php" page. The injected script appears to be an alert statement encoded using URL encoding.
What is the difference between XSS and CSRF? Cross-site scripting (or XSS) allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript within the browser of a victim user. Cross-site request forgery (or CSRF) allows an attacker to induce a victim user to perform actions that they do not intend to.
According to chat GPT:
The logs show an attempt to exploit an XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) vulnerability. The attacker injected a script into the request for the /profile.php?id= URL, and the server returned a 200 OK response with a large amount of data.
XSS attacks involve injecting malicious scripts into web pages that are viewed by other users. These scripts can be used to steal sensitive data, such as session cookies or login credentials, or to perform other malicious actions on behalf of the user whose browser is running the script.
In this case, the attacker appears to be attempting to execute a script that will trigger an alert message in the victim's browser, indicating that the XSS payload was successful.
believe it is XSS. It looks like it is trying to get or attach the download report from evilsite but looks like it is coming from the legit site. Let me know where I went wrong.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
ApplebeesWaiter1122
Highly Voted 11 months, 2 weeks agoID77
2 months, 2 weeks ago6R15
Highly Voted 1 year, 2 months agoRyanL26
1 week, 6 days agoNishkurup
1 year, 1 month agoNishkurup
1 year, 1 month agoNishkurup
1 year, 1 month agoNishkurup
1 year, 1 month agoNishkurup
1 year, 1 month agomh1143
1 year, 1 month agoNishkurup
1 year, 1 month agofryderyk
1 year agoNemish71
Most Recent 1 week, 4 days agokewokil120
2 months, 3 weeks agoevvie
3 months agodavid124
3 months, 3 weeks agoComPCertOn
6 months, 1 week agosujon_london
8 months, 2 weeks agosujon_london
8 months, 2 weeks agosujon_london
8 months, 2 weeks agoja1092m
8 months, 2 weeks agoSlySyrup
9 months, 3 weeks agosursur
10 months agomilktea810182
11 months, 4 weeks agoEvelynStandford
11 months, 4 weeks agoAbdul2107
1 year agofouserd
1 year agosmallz1979
1 year agoExlr8me
1 year, 1 month ago