Should be A, because it tests the communication User -> PVWA. Testing PVWA <--> Vault via 1858 is nonsense in my eyes. Yes, when the vault is down, 443 will be reachable while the user can not login (fields are missing). But in this case it is the vault alerting that should figure out that there might be a problem.
Unable to find a specific reference for CyberArk’s “recommendation” however traffic to the PVWA (IIS) over port 443 (SSL) will return a 200 status indicating it is still available even if it can’t talk to the vault preventing users from being able to authenticate. If instead port 1858 (e.g. https://<PVWA>/PasswordVault/api/settings/authentication) is monitored this will prevent the NLB directing users to PVWAs when they can’t talk to the vault. Therefore I’m inclined to think that B. is the best answer.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CyberARk/comments/f2x60v/f5_health_check/
https://timschindler.blog/application-health-checking-and-load-balancing-cyberark-privileged-vault-web-access-with-haproxy#heading-setting-up-haproxy:~:text=Even%20without%20a%20connection%20to%20the%20Vault%20the%20PVWA%20still%20loads
So, you mean A. Monitor Port 443 on the PVWA server
upvoted 1 times
...
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.PAM-SEN Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
f4ee4dc
1Â week ago8218179
1Â year, 5Â months agoCavdog
1Â year, 9Â months agobitcorso
11Â months, 1Â week ago