exam questions

Exam 312-49v8 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 312-49v8 exam

Exam 312-49v8 topic 1 question 150 discussion

Actual exam question from ECCouncil's 312-49v8
Question #: 150
Topic #: 1
[All 312-49v8 Questions]

According to US federal rules, to present a testimony in a court of law, an expert witness needs to furnish certain information to prove his eligibility. Jason, a qualified computer forensic expert who has started practicing two years back, was denied an expert testimony in a computer crime case by the US Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia. Considering the US federal rules, what could be the most appropriate reason for the court to reject Jason's eligibility as an expert witness?

  • A. Jason was unable to furnish documents showing four years of previous experience in the field
  • B. Being a computer forensic expert, Jason is not eligible to present testimony in a computer crime case
  • C. Jason was unable to furnish documents to prove that he is a computer forensic expert
  • D. Jason was not aware of legal issues involved with computer crimes
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
foolish
4 years, 8 months ago
This should probably be C. The question states he only has two years experience, and the suggested answer says four years.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...