exam questions

Exam FCSS_EFW_AD-7.4 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the FCSS_EFW_AD-7.4 exam

Exam FCSS_EFW_AD-7.4 topic 1 question 54 discussion

Actual exam question from Fortinet's FCSS_EFW_AD-7.4
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All FCSS_EFW_AD-7.4 Questions]

An administrator wants to scale the IBGP sessions and optimize the routing table in an IBGP network.
Which parameter should the administrator configure?

  • A. network-import-check
  • B. ibgp-enforce-multihop
  • C. neighbor-group
  • D. route-reflector-client
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Tweefo
Highly Voted 3 months ago
Selected Answer: D
I'd go with D. Allows a non–full-mesh iBGP topology. The central router (route reflector) can relay routes to its clients. Fewer sessions are needed. The routing table is lighter due to fewer duplicate routes.
upvoted 6 times
themageofsec
2 months, 1 week ago
Because of hugojt's explanation, I agree the correct answer is D. In Pag.146 is said "In large networks, full mesh peering between routers can be difficult... and not scalable". And the question "...wants to scale the IBGP sessions and optimize the routing table..."
upvoted 1 times
...
...
joeytrib
Most Recent 2 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Correct answer : D (see P146)
upvoted 1 times
...
hugojt
3 months ago
Selected Answer: B
I bet on answer B (Pag 146) Not for sure, but this command help to reduce the number of iBGP sessios inside an AS.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...