Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.

Unlimited Access

Get Unlimited Contributor Access to the all ExamTopics Exams!
Take advantage of PDF Files for 1000+ Exams along with community discussions and pass IT Certification Exams Easily.

Exam CIPP-US topic 1 question 193 discussion

Actual exam question from IAPP's CIPP-US
Question #: 193
Topic #: 1
[All CIPP-US Questions]

As a result of the Schrems II decision and CJEU opinion, what would the preferred course of action be if a Section 702 disclosure related to a foreign entity is required?

  • A. Ensure that the most recent SCC from the European Commission is being executed as a valid method of adequacy.
  • B. Provide 30 days notice to affected parties to allow the opportunity for filing a motion to quash with the court.
  • C. Seek redress from the court pursuing a protective order, since the consumer is unable to file a motion to quash.
  • D. Seek the advice of outside counsel and conduct a transfer impact assessment.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Bhimesh
3 weeks, 2 days ago
Selected Answer: D
D is the superlative option out of A,B,C... Seek the advice of outside counsel and conduct a transfer impact assessment. D. Seek the advice of outside counsel and conduct a transfer impact assessment.
upvoted 1 times
Bhimesh
3 weeks, 2 days ago
The CJEU determined that U.S. surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes does not provide protections necessary under EU law for the transfer of personal data from the EU to the United States. In Schrems II, the CJEU cited Section 702’s limitations on judicial remedies for EU citizens as falling short of the GDPR’s requirements. The CJEU reasoned that FISA 702, allow U.S. intelligence agencies to collect more information than is strictly necessary to fulfill their missions and do not provide EU citizens with sufficient avenues for judicial redress of alleged infringements of privacy
upvoted 1 times
Bhimesh
3 weeks, 2 days ago
While the CJEU struck down Privacy Shield on the grounds that U.S. surveillance law is overly permissive, the court did not close the door altogether on data transfers from the EU to the United States. Rather, Schrems II preserved the validity of Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs)—a separate mechanism under EU law for international data transfers—provided that DATA EXPORTERS take “supplementary measures” where necessary to ensure compliance with the level of protection required under EU law
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
Romeokton
3 months ago
Very strange question that I am not sure of which is the correct option - all seem wrong. I wish someone had explained it.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...