A. Changes in senior management.
The most likely factor that would result in updates to an IT risk appetite statement is "A. Changes in senior management." When there are changes in senior management, there might be shifts in the organization's strategic priorities, objectives, and risk tolerance. These changes can impact the organization's overall risk appetite and, consequently, necessitate updates to the risk appetite statement to align with the new leadership's vision and direction.
While the other options (external audit findings, feedback from focus groups, self-assessment reports) can also provide valuable insights into risk management, changes in senior management often have broader implications for the organization's risk management strategy and risk appetite, making them a likely driver for updates to the risk appetite statement.
Changes in senior management is Correct from the choices given.
External audit is an independent judgement, and more to do with the stipulated process, gaps, proper execution, documentation, and compliance. Nothing to do with Risk appetite.
IT risk appetite generally more related to senior management. Change in that may trigger change in risk appetite.
upvoted 1 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CRISC Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
endyendytse
Highly Voted 3 years, 4 months agoJosh93
3 years, 2 months agoStaanlee
Most Recent 10 months agoCbtL
1 year, 2 months agojohn_boogieman
1 year, 3 months agoJulianleehk
1 year, 4 months agoCeecil1959
2 years, 2 months agoRaj1510
2 years, 5 months ago