D. Successive assessments have the same recurring vulnerabilities.
When evaluating existing controls during a risk assessment, the greatest concern should be recurring vulnerabilities. This indicates that the controls in place are not effectively mitigating the identified risks. It suggests that there may be fundamental weaknesses in the control environment, and these vulnerabilities continue to pose a threat to the organization.
Recurring vulnerabilities can be a sign of various issues, including control ineffectiveness, inadequate risk response planning, or insufficient monitoring and improvement of controls over time. Addressing these recurring vulnerabilities should be a top priority to enhance the organization's security posture and reduce the associated risks. It's essential to identify the root causes of these vulnerabilities and take corrective actions to prevent them from reoccurring.
D seems the best answer. If there are exceptions that are covered with compensating controls, that shows there is a risk mitigation strategy. Multiple risk assessments finding the same vulnerabilities implies the findings from the assessment are not being mitigated.
I don't think you have a good grasp of compensating controls. Nowhere does it mention that the existing controls did not work. And when you give an answer, back it up with a justification or proof although this site has not provided it.
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CRISC Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Staanlee
8 months, 1 week agoCbtL
1 year, 1 month agojohn_boogieman
1 year, 2 months agoMusMus
2 years, 4 months agoCeecil1959
2 years, 1 month agoKoulyo
1 year, 1 month agoJosh93
3 years agoKhy
3 years ago