The risk of increased transactions can be understood as, considered legitimate, what is needed is processing capacity to guarantee availability, otherwise the most appropriate control would be to establish a limit on transactions. I see no indication in the question to suggest that the increase is motivated by fraudulent use.
Just wondering why D is not a possibility. Wouldn't it make sense to monitor the website activity? A properly configured SEIM should raise an alert for the SecOps team.
sorry, the question is not pointing to fraudulent transaction, but number of transaction. Its related to capacity management, hence scalable infra is more relevant.
The question is just copied without any QA done. It is not MOST electively but MOST effectively reduce...
A: Transaction limits seem more appropriate. Not scalable infrastructure.
The risk in increased transaction volume may result in fraudulent transactions, and a scalable infrastructure cannot reduce.
upvoted 2 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CRISC Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
CbtL
8 months, 2 weeks agoKoulyo
9 months, 1 week agojohn_boogieman
11 months, 1 week agoIwantnzb
1 year agoSuchib
1 year agoCeecil1959
1 year, 8 months ago