Get Unlimited Contributor Access to the all ExamTopics Exams!
Take advantage of PDF Files for 1000+ Exams along with community discussions and pass IT Certification Exams Easily.
C..I think the primary word is "Prioritize" which means to determine the order of things..Comparison to risk appetite will clearly determine the order of importance doing a full evaluation or doing a full assessent is to broad i think for this question although two of them is equally important but the context of the question i would go with C
Could be C because it says "when prioritizing risk remediation", meaning that the risks were already evaluated, now we need to compare against Risk appetite?
C. Comparison to risk appetite
All the factors listed are important in risk prioritization, the comparison to the organization's risk appetite should be the guiding principle. It ensures that risk mitigation efforts are in line with the organization's strategic objectives and tolerance for risk, helping prioritize remediation efforts effectively.
C. Comparison to risk appetite
All the factors listed are important in risk prioritization, the comparison to the organization's risk appetite should be the guiding principle. It ensures that risk mitigation efforts are in line with the organization's strategic objectives and tolerance for risk, helping prioritize remediation efforts effectively.
Going with A. Risk appetite does not facilitate prioritisation, risk assessment does. Risk appetite would tell you that risk response is adequate and not how they should be prioritised. This has a similar question in CRISC QAE.
Comparison to risk appetite refers to assessing the identified risks in relation to the organization's tolerance for risk. Risk appetite defines the level of risk that an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. It takes into account factors such as strategic goals, operational requirements, legal and regulatory obligations, and the organization's overall risk culture.
When prioritizing risk remediation efforts, it is crucial to align them with the organization's risk appetite. By comparing identified risks to the risk appetite, organizations can determine the level of priority for remediation. This ensures that resources are allocated effectively and that risks are addressed in a manner consistent with the organization's risk tolerance and strategic objectives.
While the other options may also have relevance in the risk prioritization process, they are not as fundamental as aligning with risk appetite:
While all the options listed are important considerations when prioritizing risk remediation, the impact of compliance (Option D) should be the most important consideration. Compliance with legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations is critical for any organization, and failure to comply can result in significant legal, financial, and reputational consequences.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
03allen
1 week, 6 days agonuel_12
1 month agoe891cd1
1 month, 3 weeks agoshervin2s
2 months agoMarcelus1714
2 months, 4 weeks agooluchecpoint
3 months, 1 week agoPOWNED
4 months, 1 week agooluchecpoint
8 months, 1 week agopc2502
9 months, 1 week agojennarink13
10 months, 1 week agoAndreu
10 months, 2 weeks agowello
11 months, 1 week agorichck102
11 months, 2 weeks agomad68
1 year ago[Removed]
10 months, 2 weeks agobambs
1 year, 1 month agopcheng
1 year, 1 month agoMyExamPrep7854521
1 year, 2 months ago