exam questions

Exam ITILFND V4 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the ITILFND V4 exam

Exam ITILFND V4 topic 1 question 213 discussion

Actual exam question from ITIL's ITILFND V4
Question #: 213
Topic #: 1
[All ITILFND V4 Questions]

Which statement about emergency changes is CORRECT?

  • A. Emergency changes are low risk and well understood
  • B. Authorization of emergency changes may be deferred until after implementation
  • C. It is necessary to complete all documentation before an emergency change is implemented
  • D. Emergency changes are not usually recorded in the change schedule
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
heerowiind
Highly Voted 1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Emergency changes are not typically included in a change schedule, and the process for assessment and authorization is expedited to ensure they can be implemented quickly
upvoted 11 times
...
nsjean11203
Highly Voted 9 months, 2 weeks ago
B. Authorization of emergency changes may be deferred until after implementation. Emergency changes are typically unplanned and implemented to restore service as quickly as possible. In emergency situations, it may not be possible or practical to follow the full change management process. Therefore, the authorization of emergency changes may be deferred until after implementation to minimize the time it takes to restore service. However, it is still important to document emergency changes and complete any necessary documentation as soon as possible after the change has been implemented. Emergency changes should be recorded in the change schedule to ensure that they are tracked and managed appropriately.
upvoted 6 times
...
cibernauta
Most Recent 1 month, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
Emergency changes are changes that must be implemented as soon as possible, often to resolve a major incident or implement a security patch. They still require authorization, but due to urgency, the authorization may be retrospective (i.e., after the change is made). However, they must still be recorded, typically in the change schedule, and proper documentation should follow. Why not the others? A. Emergency changes are low risk and well understood Incorrect. Emergency changes are typically high risk and not fully understood, which is why they are treated specially. C. It is necessary to complete all documentation before an emergency change is implemented Incorrect. Documentation is often completed after implementation due to urgency. D. Emergency changes are not usually recorded in the change schedule Incorrect. They are usually recorded for tracking and audit purposes, even if it's after the fact.
upvoted 1 times
...
cibernauta
1 month, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Authorization of emergency changes may be deferred until after implementation 📘 Explanation: Emergency changes are changes that must be implemented as soon as possible — usually in response to a major incident or a critical issue (e.g., security patch for a newly discovered vulnerability). Key characteristics: High urgency — they bypass some standard processes to restore service quickly. Authorization may happen retroactively, especially if immediate implementation is critical to prevent further damage. They are still documented and reviewed afterward for accountability and improvement.
upvoted 1 times
...
Donny_575
2 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
The correct answer is D. 5.2.8, pg 120, Emergency changes are not typically included in a change schedule... it is not B because that same paragraph states "As far as possible, emergency changes should be subject to the same testing, assessment, and authorization as normal changes, but it may be acceptable to defer some documentation until after the change has been implemented" this means authorization is still required before change implementation, but documentation of that authorization can be deferred, not the authorization itself.
upvoted 1 times
...
Donny_575
2 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
B and D are both correct 5.2.4, page 120 "Emergency changes are not typically included in a change schedule, and the process for assessment and authorization is expedited to ensure they can be implemented quickly. As far as possible, emergency changes should be subject to the same testing, assessment, and authorization as normal changes, but it may be acceptable to defer some documentation until after the change has been implemented..."
upvoted 2 times
...
creativesurge
8 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
The answer is D, Emergency changes are typically not included in change schedule
upvoted 1 times
...
JimBob123
8 months, 4 weeks ago
5.2.4 - Emergency changes These are changes that must be implemented as soon as possible; for example, to resolve an incident or implement a security patch. Emergency changes are not typically included in a change schedule, and the process for assessment and authorization is expedited to ensure they can be implemented quickly. A bit naughty that question.. I'd say B & D are both correct, but D is more correct because it's written first?
upvoted 1 times
...
Soshiraz
9 months, 1 week ago
Dans notre organisation ce sont les changememts accéléré qui ont une approbation à postériori à la mise oeuvre. Les changememts urgents font partis de notre calendrier pour assurer la bonne cohabitation avec les autres types de changement. Ils sont d ailleur bien documenté
upvoted 1 times
...
chamz
1 year, 3 months ago
correct answer is C
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...