Exam PL-600 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PL-600 exam

Exam PL-600 topic 1 question 40 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's PL-600

Question #: 40
Topic #: 1

HOTSPOT
-

You are a Microsoft Power Platform architect gathering solution requirements for a customer. Management uses three different systems to locate asset inventory and contract details.

Management must view inventory with the ability to select assets and view additional details. Sales representatives have issues locating assets based on specific features in a timely manner when working with customers.

You need to prioritize the requirements.

Which priority should you use? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer:

by hitmaker at April 10, 2023, 5:38 p.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

Ninashnash

Highly Voted 2 years, 1 month ago

Based on the Priority Quadrants chart in the following document from Microsoft, the priority is categorized into four categories of "Quick Wins", "Big Investment", "Little Satisfiers", "Time Consumers" . so, Functional and Non Functional are ruled out. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-apps/guidance/planning/prioritizing-features

upvoted 15 times

Ninashnash

2 years, 1 month ago

The remaining options for this question are: Quick Win and Time Consumer. To me, the right answer for Sales representatives requirements is "quick win" and for Managers is "time Consumer"

upvoted 2 times

Ninashnash

2 years, 1 month ago

Well, I just realized this is related to "Features" not requirements. Therefore, the provided answer "NF", "F" are correct!. I wish I could delete my response

upvoted 10 times

dylan99

1 year, 3 months ago

Functional or Non functional help to categorize, not prioritize, so you were right

upvoted 3 times

...

xanr4711

Highly Voted 2 years, 1 month ago

My Answers: Quick-Win, Big-Investment It's not about functional or non-function, it's about priotizing: Both requirements will have a big business impact The first one is easy to achieve, so Quick-Win The second one is harder to implement, so Big-Investment

upvoted 10 times

Peter1972

2 years, 1 month ago

Absolutely agree with you.. This is a tricky question and my first impulse was also to use Non-Function and Functional but this is the categorization of the requirements and has nothing to do with the priorization.

upvoted 1 times

...

Aibloy

2 years, 1 month ago

"The first one is easy to achieve, so Quick-Win The second one is harder to implement, so Big-Investment" You don't know if it is easy or not, not enought context and architecture, if you can't classify the difficulty, for me is Non functional and functional.

upvoted 2 times

...

Hamed64

Most Recent 1 week, 1 day ago

Requirement 1: functional This is a functional requirement because it directly relates to what the system should do—help sales reps find assets efficiently based on features. Requirement 2: functional This is also a functional requirement because it defines a specific capability the system must provide—viewing inventory and asset details.

upvoted 1 times

...

nishucrm

7 months ago

Quick win and big investment.

upvoted 1 times

...

LSgeek

10 months ago

Quick Win Functional

upvoted 1 times

...

rockyoz

1 year, 2 months ago

No matter where the 3 systems are, the integration with them will be time consuming, so it will rull out quick win and little satisfier. Depends on what is the business impact, and how you evaluate management decisions and customer satisfictions. I would assume better time ensure better customer so sales one will be a time consumer. To me the management one can be a timer consumer too if it is has huge impact, i.e. we need the information to make decision. However, ideally there can be an baseline solution which may just be time consuming. So... Need more information. before that both time consumer.

upvoted 1 times

...

MrEz

1 year, 3 months ago

A) it is about priority B) Management uses three different systems to locate asset inventory and contract details asset inventory (1) and contract details (2) but 3 systems for these 2 business objects (it says nothing about contact as a third object). C)different systems -> not data verse. --> Data integration project is seldom a quick win, right? especially when you don't know if for the sales searching assets may search (integrate?) in 2 systems both time-consumers

upvoted 1 times

...

TW_27

2 years, 1 month ago

This is a trick question to make sure you're reading. It asks you to prioritize, NOT categorize as functional or non-functional.

upvoted 3 times

...

Parth91

2 years, 1 month ago

Enable sales representatives to locate assets in less time Priority: Quick Win Enable management to view inventory and asset details Priority: Functional, possibly Big Investment (depending on the scope and complexity of the current systems and the requirements for the new solution).

upvoted 2 times

...

hitmaker

2 years, 2 months ago

1. Non Functional 2. Functional

upvoted 3 times

...