ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Microsoft Discussions
exam questions

Exam AZ-400 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AZ-400 exam
Go to Exam

Exam AZ-400 topic 9 question 13 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's AZ-400
Question #: 13
Topic #: 9
[All AZ-400 Questions]

DRAG DROP
-

You use Semantic Versioning (SemVer) as a dependency versioning strategy.

You perform changes to code as shown in the following table.



Which part of the version should you increment for each change? To answer, drag the appropriate parts to the correct changes. Each part may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
by Atina6 at Oct. 3, 2023, 12:48 p.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
Atina6
Highly Voted 1 year, 1 month ago
Regardless of whether the incompatibility is minor or significant, if a change is not backward-compatible, you should increment the MAJOR version. So all three should be Major. https://semver.org/
upvoted 15 times
mfawew223
11 months, 1 week ago
Minor changes can be either backwards compatible or not. The first is Minor because incompatibility is "minor" (meaning definitely not major) and new features are something that can be found in Minor updates but not patches. 2nd is major because significant incompatibility can only be major. 3rd is tricky. Patches are generally seen as backwards compatible, but there are exceptions. Minor, as said, can be either or. The "No" for new features makes me think patch, because generally speaking, patches are for bug fixes and not new features. And Minor updates main focus is not bug fixes. Its extensive modifications smaller than "major" changes. I think I would go Minor, Major, Patch, as the solution suggests
upvoted 4 times
mfawew223
11 months, 1 week ago
Sorry, replace "features" with "functionality" throughout the explanation to match the question's wording. Patches are for bug fixes, not new functionality.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
cluqueg
Highly Voted 12 months ago
Given answer is correct. This topic is described here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/modules/implement-versioning-strategy/2-understand-versioning-of-artifacts Minor could include non-backwards compatible changes.
upvoted 11 times
...
3a6495b
Most Recent 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Mayor Mayor Mayor
upvoted 1 times
...
vsvaid
10 months, 1 week ago
Agree with Minor, Major and Patch
upvoted 4 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago