Exam MB-330 topic 19 question 4 discussion

A only changes status, ignoring location consolidation. B adds replenishment, which is demand-driven, not consolidation-focused. C works for intra-warehouse moves but not inter-warehouse consolidation. D handles both status (cleared for sale) and inter-warehouse consolidation via a transfer order, fully resolving the multi-location scenario. D is the strongest solution because: Changing the status to "Available" post-testing meets the "cleared for sale" condition. A transfer order consolidates stock across San Diego, Denver, and Budapest into a primary location (e.g., San Diego, the headquarters), fulfilling the requirement to consolidate stocking locations

It's such a vaguely worded question, I'm almost impressed. Assuming the items have yet to be tested, changing the status (to blocked) makes sense. Assuming he will wait until AFTER testing to consolidate, then (A) makes sense. Though honestly, to me it makes as much sense to consolidate the items to one place BEFORE, not after testing. In real life, I would probably choice (C) but for testing purposes, I guess (A) makes the most sense.