Exam MS-102 topic 1 question 359 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's MS-102

Question #: 359
Topic #: 1

HOTSPOT
-

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains the identities shown in the following table.

From the Microsoft Defender portal, you create an anti-spam inbound policy named Policy1 that has the following settings:

• Include these users, groups and domains
o Users: User3
o Groups: Group 1
• Exclude these users, groups and domains
o Users: User1

Policy1 has the following Bulk email threshold & spam properties settings:

• Mark as spam
о Empty messages: On
о Object tags in HTML On
о Sensitive words: Off
о Backscatter: On

Policy1 has the following Actions settings:

• Message actions
o Spam: Move message to Junk Email folder
o High confidence spam: Move message to Junk Email folder

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer:

by 7d01a47 at Oct. 23, 2024, 5:16 p.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

justITtopics

Highly Voted 7 months ago

I think: Yes, No, No The policy is for INBOUND 1: User 2 is member of group 2, which is member of group 1 (nested groups), so: Yes 2: Sensitive words are off, so: No 3: User 1 is excluded, but member of group1. I think exclusions take preference, so: No Please, let me know if I'm wrong.

upvoted 12 times

justITtopics

4 months, 2 weeks ago

I am correcting my answer: No, No, No The policy is for INBOUND 1: User 2 is a member of group 2, which is a member of group 1 (nested groups) and I'm not sure if it will work with nested groups. Anyway, User 1 is excluded, so the policy doesn't apply: NO 2: Sensitive words are disabled, so: No 3: User 1 is excluded, but member of group1. Exclusions take preference, so: No

upvoted 4 times

...

Krayzr

5 months ago

I thought Nested groups do not work :?

upvoted 2 times

...

BigO76

5 months ago

i think your wrong... as far as i know exclusions take precedence over inclusions, so if a user is explicitly excluded, Policy1 does not apply to them, even if they are part of an included group.....User1 is excluded from Policy1. Therefore, the policy does not evaluate or act on messages sent by User1..so answers are: No-No-No.

upvoted 2 times

...

7d01a47

Highly Voted 7 months, 3 weeks ago

Statement 1: No Statement 2: No Statement 3: No Not sure, but I would choose No on all

upvoted 10 times

...

Frank_2022

Most Recent 1 month, 2 weeks ago

1, Yes, user2 is an indirect member of Group1 (from Group2) 2, No, Sensitive words: Off 3, No, user1 exclude(exclusion generally takes precedence)

upvoted 1 times

...

BJS78

4 months, 4 weeks ago

If the users are in the same tenant and domain, filter won't do anything. I tested the scenario (and I hope I did no mistake in config) all mails got delivered.

upvoted 1 times

...