Exam AZ-140 topic 3 question 46 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's AZ-140

Question #: 46
Topic #: 3

You have an Azure subscription that contains two users named User1 and User2 and the Microsoft Entra groups shown in the following table.

You have an Azure Virtual Desktop host pool named Pool1 that contains two session hosts named Host1 and Host2. The session hosts use FSLogix user profiles.

Host1 contains the local groups shown in the following table.

Host2 contains the local groups shown in the following table.

User1 connects to Pool and modifies his desktop.

User1 reports that when he reconnects to Pool, the desktop modifications fail to appear.

You need to ensure that User1 sees the modified desktop when he connects to Pool. The solution must minimize the impact on other user profiles.

What should you do?

A. Add User1 to both FSLogix Profile Include list groups.
B. Remove Group2 from both FSLogix Profile Exclude list groups.
C. Remove User1 from Group3.
D. Remove Group3 from Group2.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

by Moot2 at Jan. 21, 2025, 11:45 a.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

sergioandreslq

2 months, 3 weeks ago

Selected Answer: C

My understanding of the question is to enable session persistent to user1 and not apply any change to user2, in this context, we should go with C. However, if the objective is to enable persistent session for user1 and user2, the easy way is B or D which is remove the exclusion for group 3.

upvoted 2 times

...

d7b83e2

4 months ago

Selected Answer: C

If it was to minimize effort, I would go with D. Because it asks to minimize impact on other users, I would touch User1 only

upvoted 1 times

...

AITANA_MANAGEMENT

4 months, 2 weeks ago

Selected Answer: D

User2 might have the same problem, so to minimize the impact on other users, we should remove group3 from group2.

upvoted 1 times

...

smartleb961

4 months, 3 weeks ago

Selected Answer: C

b c and d would achieve this but the question states to minimis impact on other user profiles so would go with C.

upvoted 1 times

...

hwoccurrence

5 months ago

Selected Answer: B

Rather than messing with User1’s group memberships (which could disrupt other permissions), the minimal‐impact fix is to remove Group2 from the “Exclude” lists so that no one in Group2 (including User1) is excluded from FSLogix roaming.

upvoted 1 times

d7b83e2

4 months ago

But that will impact User2 too

upvoted 1 times

...

Moot2

5 months ago

Selected Answer: C

C minimise other users so removed User1 from group 3 to stop the exclusion

upvoted 1 times

...