exam questions

Exam MS-500 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the MS-500 exam

Exam MS-500 topic 4 question 63 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's MS-500
Question #: 63
Topic #: 4
[All MS-500 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You have a Microsoft 365 subscription that contains 1,000 user mailboxes.
An administrator named Admin1 must be able to search for the name of a competing company in the mailbox of a user named User5.
You need to ensure that Admin1 can search the mailbox of User5 successfully. The solution must prevent Admin1 from sending email messages as User5.
Solution: You assign the eDiscovery Manager role to Admin1, and then create an eDiscovery case.
Does this meet the goal?

  • A. Yes
  • B. No
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️
Reference:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/policy-and-compliance/ediscovery/ediscovery?view=exchserver-2019

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
TheSkyMan
Highly Voted 5 years, 1 month ago
A couple new questions I remember from the exam are: What type of groups can be used with a supervision policy? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/configure-supervision-policies?view=o365-worldwide How to apply an access review. Specifically, what users will have access to an app after the access review has ended. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/governance/perform-access-review
upvoted 13 times
...
HTD
Most Recent 1 year, 11 months ago
By creating a custom role with the necessary permissions for searching mailboxes and excluding the permission to send email messages, you can ensure that Admin1 can search User5's mailbox successfully without being able to send email messages as User5. This provides the desired level of access while maintaining appropriate restrictions.
upvoted 1 times
...
mkoprivnj
3 years, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: A
A is correct!
upvoted 1 times
...
kiketxu
4 years, 3 months ago
This time YES, is right.
upvoted 2 times
...
Sido1
4 years, 3 months ago
the answer doesn't solve the second scenerio "preventing admin1 from sending email message to user5"
upvoted 2 times
Sido1
4 years, 3 months ago
oh i got it..i think its right !. "AS"
upvoted 2 times
...
WMG
3 years, 10 months ago
By default no one can send email messages as someone else, so we are all good on that end. The reason they have that part is so you use the proper way, eDiscovery, and not brute forcing into the mailbox with full access permissions (even if full access !=send as)..
upvoted 4 times
...
...
Nicholasname
4 years, 11 months ago
"Following the release of communication compliance in Microsoft 365 Compliance in February 2020, Supervision in Office 365 is being retired. Supervision policies will no longer be available for creation, and policies will eventually be removed, after an extended period of read only access." https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/configure-supervision-policies?view=o365-worldwide
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...