Suggested Answer:C🗳️
Create information barrier segments first, then create information barrier policy based on the segments then start the information barrier application. Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/information-barriers-policies
The key to this question lays in the following sentence "What should you do first?" FIRST.
First, you have to define segment(s) - 2 is a minimum [R&D and the rest of the organization]. Secondly, you have to define a policy.
I vote for C.
I first thought only one segment 'HR' needs to be created. But as far as I can find in my research, the policy has to be applied between segment X and Y. You cannot apply it from X to 'global'. So, you need to make two segments; 1) HR and 2) Everyone else
This is D, remember it is MS, the wording must be followed in their exams, it states only to send messages to other departments, it does not mention receiving. 2 policies would be needed if receiving was also to be blocked.
You are incorrect. When you want to block segments from communicating with each other, you define two policies: one for each direction. Each policy blocks communication one way only. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/information-barriers-policies?view=o365-worldwide#scenario-1-block-communications-between-segments
I belive the D is correct and here is why:
C is about Segments (New-OrganizationSegment) that is used to filter users and and to this 'virtual' segment. If you create segments, that won't do any blocking. It is like creating a group of users. Example:
New-OrganizationSegment -Name "HR" -UserGroupFilter "Department -eq 'HR'"
D is about the New-InformationBarrierPolicy, which is used to block/allow communication between previously created segments. Here I would create segments for all departments and I would do the blocking rule just with a single command:
New-InformationBarrierPolicy -Name "R&D block policy againts all other departments" -AssignedSegment "R&D" -SegmentsBlocked ("IT","Sales","HR") -State Active
What should you do first?
Part 1: Segment users in your organization
Part 2: Define information barrier policies
Part 3: Apply information barrier policies
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/information-barriers-policies?view=o365-worldwide#the-work-flow-at-a-glance
I'm going with D!
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/information-barriers-policies?view=o365-worldwide#scenario-1-block-communications-between-segments
I totally agree with people say C, because they are thinking that the R&D department need to be cut off completely, but they don't. IBPs block traffic in one-way only, and that's all we need.
"Users in the R&D group must be prevented from sending chat messages to users in other departments."
Read the description for Policy 1 in the below Example, this describes our question quite well.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/information-barriers-policies?view=o365-worldwide#example-contosos-departments-segments-and-policies
I'm going with D.
Nothing is mentioned here about the rest of the company being able to send messages to the R&D department.
I have changed my opinion on this. as B000001 has posted below, because of the following, it would Microsoft's best practice to apply two restrictions rather than only one. One IB placed may work, but as far as Microsoft are concerned, it shouldn't.
Information barriers only supports two way restrictions. One way restrictions, such as marketing can communicate and collaborate with day traders, but day traders cannot communicate and collaborate with marketing is not supported.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/information-barriers?view=o365-worldwide
What about this link:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/exchange/start-informationbarrierpoliciesapplication?view=exchange-ps
I go with A
Still not clear, why should you create two information barriers, as the question is says block communication from sales to other department and vice versa, i would go with D
Ignore my previous message - sorry...it is C... Question - What should you do first?
Part 1: Segment users
Part 2: Define information barrier policies
Part 3: Apply information barrier policies
After further research, I think the answer is D. Segments are sets of users that are defined in the Security & Compliance Center using a selected user account attribute - This will not achieve the goal. You Do not assign more than one policy to a segment..
Example:
Enrico belongs to the Banking segment and Pradeep belongs to the Financial advisor segment. Enrico and Pradeep can't communicate with each other because the organization's IB policy blocks communication and collaboration between these two segments. However, Enrico and Pradeep can communicate with Lee in HR
Answer is C - Information barriers only supports two way restrictions. One way restrictions, such as marketing can communicate with day traders, but day traders cannot communicate with marketing is not supported.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/information-barriers?view=o365-worldwide
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.MS-700 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Concervative
Highly Voted 4 years, 9 months agoNAMP
4 years agoroelvandew
3 years, 2 months agoRuuddie
4 years agodwsse
Highly Voted 4 years, 10 months agoPDR
4 years, 8 months agoLipseal
4 years agoStever
3 years, 11 months agoJoskeVr
Most Recent 11 months, 3 weeks agoMK247
2 years, 2 months agoNokwai
2 years, 10 months agoAJCG
2 years, 11 months agoMalkerian
3 years, 4 months agomnrqt
3 years, 7 months agomnrqt
3 years, 7 months agoTMW
4 years agobadguytoo
4 years agoMoko007
4 years, 1 month agoMoko007
4 years, 1 month agoforummj
4 years, 1 month agoforummj
4 years, 1 month agoforummj
4 years, 1 month agoRadosna
4 years, 3 months agoHuseinHasan
4 years, 5 months agoHuseinHasan
4 years, 5 months agoB000001
4 years, 7 months agoB000001
4 years, 7 months agoB000001
4 years, 7 months ago