exam questions

Exam AZ-220 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AZ-220 exam

Exam AZ-220 topic 2 question 23 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's AZ-220
Question #: 23
Topic #: 2
[All AZ-220 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You have devices that connect to an Azure IoT hub. Each device has a fixed GPS location that includes latitude and longitude.
You discover that a device entry in the identity registry of the IoT hub is missing the GPS location.
You need to configure the GPS location for the device entry. The solution must prevent the changes from being propagated to the physical device.
Solution: You add the desired properties to the device twin.
Does the solution meet the goal?

  • A. Yes
  • B. No
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
mk07
Highly Voted 4 years, 12 months ago
shouldn't this be device tag? it says changes should not propagate to device.
upvoted 27 times
getazusername
4 years, 7 months ago
yes, https://docs.microsoft.com/de-de/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-devguide-device-twins
upvoted 4 times
...
...
EyeeyeeyeeyeeyeeyeeyeeyeSPIDER
Highly Voted 4 years, 10 months ago
Correct, the answer should be YES here
upvoted 11 times
...
coramella
Most Recent 3 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Desired props are propagated to device. No is the answer
upvoted 4 times
...
JeeBi
4 years, 1 month ago
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/learn/modules/remotely-monitor-devices-with-azure-iot-hub/7-write-code-device-twins => Tags: information on the device that isn't visible to the device. Changes should not be sent to the device, so I would go with tags and answer B 'No'
upvoted 4 times
...
Ashwinee
4 years, 2 months ago
i think ans is No. tags should be used
upvoted 5 times
...
sballmer
4 years, 5 months ago
I think No is the right answer, in my opinion "adding a tag to the device twin" means adding a data to the desired property, which will be transmited to the device and we must prevent changes being propagated to the device. The solution is to add a tag to the device, not to the device twin.
upvoted 2 times
pbleep
4 years, 4 months ago
Tags are not desired properties and are not seen by the device and therefore would not trigger a response. Desired properties themselves are seen by devices and would trigger a response
upvoted 4 times
...
...
Lihz
4 years, 6 months ago
I think should be A.
upvoted 1 times
...
ipindado2020
4 years, 6 months ago
A is the way
upvoted 1 times
...
srama79
4 years, 6 months ago
Answer should be YES ..
upvoted 2 times
...
spartons12345
4 years, 7 months ago
I think the answer should be Yes
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...