exam questions

Exam MS-203 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the MS-203 exam

Exam MS-203 topic 1 question 13 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's MS-203
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All MS-203 Questions]

HOTSPOT -
You have a Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 organization.
You have the Address Book Policies (ABP) and address lists in the following table.

You have the users in the following table.

You assign ABP1 to User1 and User2.
User3 is NOT assigned to an Address Book Policy.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Hot Area:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
Reference:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/email-addresses-and-address-books/address-book-policies/address-book-policies?view=exchserver-2019

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Domza
Highly Voted 2 years, 6 months ago
Correct answers. Because: User 1 and User 2 in Not in the same GAL. BP1 has to have GAL with both Users in it to see each other. User 3 is not part of BP 1, so he can see entire Org by default. With Love~
upvoted 16 times
...
Bryan
Highly Voted 3 years, 4 months ago
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/address-books/address-book-policies/assign-an-address-book-policy-to-mail-users. " Users aren't automatically assigned an ABP when you create mailboxes. If you don't assign an ABP to a mailbox, the GAL for your entire organization is visible to the user in Outlook and Outlook on the web. Furthermore, a user that's assigned an ABP needs to exist in the GAL that's specified for the ABP. For more information, see Considerations and best practices for address book policies."
upvoted 7 times
...
Amir1909
Most Recent 5 months ago
Is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
Baba65Baba
2 years, 2 months ago
Agree with the answers: User 1 and User 2 are not in the same GAL. So, logically they cannot see each other. User 3 is not part of ABP 1, so he can see entire Org by default (default GAL).
upvoted 2 times
...
yeahyeah
3 years, 3 months ago
Why is user 2 question answer no? Wouldn't user be limited to GAL2?
upvoted 3 times
KennethYY
2 years, 7 months ago
User2 in ABP1... be careful word
upvoted 1 times
...
GoldenPapa
3 years, 3 months ago
user2 already added to GAL1
upvoted 3 times
...
YClaveria
2 years, 1 month ago
"A user that's assigned an ABP needs to exist in the GAL that's specified for the ABP." - In this case, it is safe to assume that User2 was added to GAL1, and then assigned ABP1 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/address-books/address-book-policies/assign-an-address-book-policy-to-mail-users
upvoted 2 times
...
...
mm79
3 years, 5 months ago
How can User 3 see the membership of list 1?
upvoted 4 times
Wallem89
3 years, 5 months ago
exactly my thoughts @mm79
upvoted 1 times
...
tuliopulquerio
3 years, 5 months ago
I have the same question. Pls let me know if you found this answer somewhere.
upvoted 1 times
...
MerSee99
3 years, 5 months ago
If you have not assigned a Address Book Policy, you can see all address lists
upvoted 14 times
tuliopulquerio
3 years, 5 months ago
do you have any link where this is explained? let me know
upvoted 1 times
Harry83
3 years, 4 months ago
It is the default Outlook/Exchange behavior. All Address Lists are visible from the Address Book drop down list inside the Outlook client. Except if you make specific changes like applying an Address Book Policy or changing Address Lists or GALs ACEs.
upvoted 7 times
...
...
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago