Exam MB-310 topic 6 question 9 discussion

I think answer would be 1.1, 2.3 and 3.1

Shouldn't this be account structure rather then dimension set

So, the point that everyone is ignoring is you don't exclude / include marketing from EITHER the account structure or the financial dimension set. The question is worded very poorly. To exclude them from the account structure would mean no departments or divisions at all; that can't be right! But to exclude them from the financial dimension sets is incorrect to: this would just mean that you can reports balances for given combinations of financial dimension sets. You actually would exclude them from financial dimension VALUES. E.g. you create the financial dimensions of departments and division; then create the values for each (what departments, what divisions). Finally, you create an account structure. ... Now, that may sound pedantic, but financial dimension values and financial dimension sets really are completely different things, even though a lot of people, veterans included, would struggle to articulate the difference.

Two dimensions are used: Department and Division.

Company A is a subsidiaries so EXCLUDİNG! Answer 1.1. 2.2. 3.1

Fourth Coffee Account Structure EXCLUDE Company A Account Structure EXCLUDE Assign relevant account structure to the legal entity ledger

Fourth Coffee Account Structure EXCLUDE Company A Account Structure INCLUDE Then assign

Every Answer listed is WRONG. Need to exclude the financial dimension from the account structure. Make sure you assign the correct acct structure to the ledger

Valid dimensions means you need to configure account structure, as it also combination of financial dimensions which are valid.

Account structure is the right answer and not dimension set.