exam questions

Exam AZ-303 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AZ-303 exam

Exam AZ-303 topic 5 question 71 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's AZ-303
Question #: 71
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-303 Questions]

Note: This question is part of series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are planning to create a virtual network that has a scale set that contains six virtual machines (VMs).
A monitoring solution on a different network will need access to the VMs inside the scale set.
You need to define public access to the VMs.
Solution: Deploy a standalone VM that has a public IP address to the virtual network.
Does the solution meet the goal?

  • A. Yes
  • B. No
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
SyntaxError
Highly Voted 4 years, 7 months ago
https://www.examtopics.com/exams/microsoft/az-300/view/15/
upvoted 12 times
...
malyaban
Highly Voted 4 years, 4 months ago
The answer should be NO here and the 3rd question answer should be Yes in this set. Deploying one VM with PIP does not solve anything as the monitoring solution is on a different vnet and it needs access to all the VMs in this vnet, whereas if all the VMs have PIPs then that monitoring solution will have access to all of them and the requirement will be met.
upvoted 6 times
der3mi
3 years, 6 months ago
what question are you referring to?
upvoted 1 times
...
...
DonBoat
Most Recent 3 years, 7 months ago
In general, Azure scale set virtual machines do not require their own public IP addresses. For most scenarios, it is more economical and secure to associate a public IP address to a load balancer or to an individual virtual machine (aka a jumpbox), which then routes incoming connections to scale set virtual machines as needed (for example, through inbound NAT rules).
upvoted 1 times
...
tteesstt
3 years, 11 months ago
The answer could be Yes given more context, otherwise No.
upvoted 4 times
...
syu31svc
3 years, 11 months ago
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machine-scale-sets/virtual-machine-scale-sets-networking In general, Azure scale set virtual machines do not require their own public IP addresses. For most scenarios, it is more economical and secure to associate a public IP address to a load balancer or to an individual virtual machine (also known as a jumpbox), which then routes incoming connections to scale set virtual machines as needed (for example, through inbound NAT rules). I would take Yes
upvoted 3 times
...
aut0pil0t
4 years ago
No. This is only half a solution, not a complete solution.
upvoted 4 times
...
One111
4 years, 4 months ago
It doesnt make sens.You setup scale set with private ip and six machines (to be isolated and get HA) and then you put it behind single VM with public IP? Absolutly no. Use Insights from Azure Monitor and Log Analitics agents to do monitoring. Also get Application Gateway\FrontDoor to provide public access to app on VMs in Scale Set.
upvoted 4 times
...
DNeo
4 years, 4 months ago
the question is lacking details and correct answer is uncertain here
upvoted 1 times
...
BigDaddyAus
4 years, 4 months ago
Question is not really clear, I presume here the VM with the public IP will also run the Log Analytics Gateway and the Monitoring solution is Azure Monitor (through Log Analytics). In this scenario then Yes the answer is correct. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/agents/gateway
upvoted 2 times
...
JackFrag
4 years, 6 months ago
VM with public IP should server the job. As public IP or routable IP is needed to allow "public access" . Hence answer should be A
upvoted 1 times
pentium75
4 years ago
If you do nothing but add a VM with a public IP, how would the monitoring solution be able to access 'all the (other) VMs'? (There is nothing mentioned that you would install a gateway on that VM or something else.)
upvoted 3 times
...
...
G_Z
4 years, 6 months ago
A is correct answer. Azure Monitor for VMs stores its data in Azure Monitor Logs, which allows it to deliver powerful aggregation and filtering and to analyze data trends over time. You can view this data in a single VM from the virtual machine directly, or you can use Azure Monitor to deliver an aggregated view of multiple VMs.
upvoted 3 times
...
Stephan99
4 years, 6 months ago
Correct anser is no, Use Virtual machine scale set insights from Azure Monitor. Install Log Analytics agent on the virtual machine scale set. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/virtual-machine-scale-set-insights-from-azure-monitor/ https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/insights/vminsights-enable-overview#supported-operating-systems
upvoted 1 times
xaccan
4 years, 6 months ago
no it is A The new Machine will work as a Jump server.
upvoted 8 times
saidov1981
4 years, 2 months ago
This is valid if Bastion is used which is not specified in the question.
upvoted 4 times
...
pentium75
4 years ago
But per the question you do not configure 'the new machine as a jump server'. You just install a VM with a public IP. That ALONE does surely not solve the problem.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...