Exam PL-400 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PL-400 exam

Exam PL-400 topic 3 question 8 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's PL-400

Question #: 8
Topic #: 3

HOTSPOT -
Fabrikam, Inc, has two divisions as shown in the Business Unit exhibit. (Click the Business Unit tab.)

✑ Fabrikam Residences rents units short term to clients.
✑ Fabrikam Property Management deals with the maintenance of the units and manages the contractors who perform the maintenance.
✑ Clients and contractors are both stored in the Contact entity.
The manager of the Property Management business unit is a member of the Fabrikam Residences business unit, which has the root security role as shown in the
Security Role exhibit. (Click the Security Role tab.)

The manager cannot see the contact record shown in the Contact exhibit. (Click the Contact tab.)

You need to ensure that the manager can view contact records owned by someone in the Residences business unit.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement achieves the goal. Otherwise, select No.
Hot Area:

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer:

by michael_w999 at Jan. 31, 2021, 1:16 p.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

TestingCRM

Highly Voted 3 years, 2 months ago

This question is probably badly articulated. That said, my answer would be: - No: security inheritance would only give the Manager basic read access, so that it wouldn't be able to see the records in the child Residences business unit. - No: the Common Data Service User security role only privides the Manager with basic read access, so that it wouldn't be able to see the records in the child Residences business unit. - No: I understand the manager is in the root business unit based on this statement: "The manager of the Property Management business unit is a member of a Fabrikam business unit", so that 'Deep' or 'Parent: Child Business Units' would be required to access child business unit records

upvoted 32 times

...

paulojorge

Highly Voted 3 years, 5 months ago

Third is No because Manager is not on Child BU as Record. To be true it must be BU and Child BU.

upvoted 16 times

FDC

3 years, 3 months ago

I agree the Third is No only with BU and Child BU can see these contacts

upvoted 4 times

...

Juan0414

Most Recent 4 months, 1 week ago

Really weird question. It says "The manager of the Property Management business unit is a member of the Fabrikam Residences business unit", so if it is a member of the residences business unit, and the contact table read permission is set to BU, then he will be able to see "contact records owned by someone in the Residences business unit". So, I'd stick with the provided answers: Y N Y

upvoted 1 times

...

At09

9 months, 2 weeks ago

Answer YNN

upvoted 1 times

...

jkaur

11 months ago

No, No, No

upvoted 1 times

...

ClairFraser

2 years, 1 month ago

Agree with last one - for these options it is No, No, No

upvoted 1 times

...

fayeje1956

2 years, 4 months ago

I had this question on my exam and there is a mistake in the dump's text. It should be "The manager of the Property Management business unit is a member of a Fabrikam RESIDENCES business unit". My answers here were YNN.

upvoted 12 times

...

Anastasii

2 years, 8 months ago

Role gives organization level access on Read privilege to Contact entity. Therefore, manager has access to all Contact records. Question already contains a mistake therefore attempts to recognize right answers have no sense.

upvoted 6 times

fihemal249

2 years, 7 months ago

If you count the balls, the Role only has User level access.

upvoted 8 times

...

Odidepse

3 years, 1 month ago

I dont get why the manager cannot see the contact record where the screenshot clearly defined the permission as organizational (green) for the read which should give him/her access to the contact record irrespective of BU.

upvoted 8 times

Odidepse

3 years, 1 month ago

Ok got it

upvoted 1 times

pragati_dubey

3 years ago

I've same question as yours.

upvoted 3 times

kT185

2 years, 3 months ago

Ok now I got it. The dots for the read permission are misaligned on the provided screenshot. Contact is the 12th line and the 12th dot is set to user level.

upvoted 5 times

...

Pavi20210211

3 years, 1 month ago

The Correct answer : Yes, No , No

upvoted 9 times

...

val_maly

3 years, 2 months ago

Because he is an MANAGER for Property Management business user does that mean that we also need to take in account the Manager Hierarchy. What would be the answers in this case?

upvoted 1 times

...

saadnadir

3 years, 3 months ago

- NO, no mention of any team assignment in the question - NO, Even moving to the highest level of BU, the read privlieges is still in the basic level User - Yes : Raise the read privilege to Business Unit level solve the issue

upvoted 7 times

Yvesk

3 years ago

No, you need to raise one level higher, to "Parent: Child Business Units", since the manager has rights in the root business unit, not in the Fabricam business unit

upvoted 5 times

Dynamics_Exam

9 months, 3 weeks ago

But the manager is part of the residence business unit: "The manager of the Property Management business unit is a member of a Fabrikam RESIDENCES business unit". To make sure, he can view the contacts of this business unit, it is enough to raise his rights to business unit level.

upvoted 2 times

...

michael_w999

3 years, 5 months ago

Answer to third statement should be No. Current read access level is global,so changing to BU level cannot resolve the issue.

upvoted 6 times

azerazerazerazrezqaer

3 years, 5 months ago

The dots for the read permission are misaligned Contact is the 12th line and the 12th dot is set to user lever The 3rd answer is yes

upvoted 18 times

...

subhamr77

3 years, 5 months ago

Wrong. Count from the top. The alignment is not correct in the picture. So, answer to third statement should be Yes.

upvoted 11 times

hooper22

2 years, 8 months ago

should be no. take note that the manager is under the parent bu, thus bu level privilege won't be enough.

upvoted 3 times

...

Yvesk

3 years ago

No, because "Business Unit" is not enough, you'd require "Parent: Child Business Units".

upvoted 7 times

...