ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Microsoft Discussions
exam questions

Exam AZ-304 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AZ-304 exam
Go to Exam

Exam AZ-304 topic 3 question 15 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's AZ-304
Question #: 15
Topic #: 3
[All AZ-304 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You are designing an Azure solution for a company that has four departments. Each department will deploy several Azure app services and Azure SQL databases.
You need to recommend a solution to report the costs for each department to deploy the app services and the databases. The solution must provide a consolidated view for cost reporting that displays cost broken down by department.
Solution: Create a resource group for each resource type. Assign tags to each resource group.
Does this meet the goal?

  • A. Yes
  • B. No
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️
by timHAG at April 30, 2021, 11:17 p.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
sunmonkey
Highly Voted 4 years ago
No since each department will deploy several app services and DBs. If we group like resources in resource groups we will not be able to get a break down by department.
upvoted 53 times
gssd4scoder
3 years, 11 months ago
Agree hundred percent with you
upvoted 2 times
kubinho
3 years, 10 months ago
why not ? You are not able to filter by tags? If you have 4 dept a 1 resources group for lets say storage account and you tag every SA with name of department, then you can filter tags and see departments resources and see price.. I would say answer is YES in here
upvoted 3 times
Amit3
3 years, 10 months ago
The questions say tag resource group and not resources, so how can you get which resource belongs to which department?.
upvoted 13 times
VincentZhang
3 years, 6 months ago
Answer is almost correct, just tag on the resources instead of resource group as what said in explanation.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
...
AlexD332
3 years, 10 months ago
there are no words they will use resources from other department so we can assume they will use only their own resources - the answer is YES
upvoted 3 times
BoxGhost
3 years, 8 months ago
Look at the wording. It says create a resource group for each resource type. It should be create a resource group for each department. "Create a resource group for each resource type. Assign tags to each resource group." It also states each department will deploy web apps and SQL. Therefore the solution doesn't work.
upvoted 14 times
...
...
...
ZetaZeti
Highly Voted 3 years, 10 months ago
No. You have to assign a tag like Department1 or Department2 or Department3 or Department4 on each resource so you can filter for instance all resources relative to the first department by selecting the tag Department1. The option is wrong because if we put let me say all the storage accounts in RG1 and we assign a tag to it as the option says for instance StAcs we don't have any possibility to filter the storage accounts belonging to the first department.
upvoted 13 times
ZetaZeti
3 years, 10 months ago
Of course another option would be to create 4 RGs one for each department and to assign a tag to each one like Department1 or Department2 or Department3 or Department4. Then we put inside the RG tagged Department1 all the resources belonging to the first department and so on. In this case though we do not have the RGs divided by resource type as the option requires.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
GaneshPP
Most Recent 2 years, 6 months ago
Ans is NO. RG will have resources from all depts, so no use of its tag.
upvoted 1 times
...
AubinBakana
2 years, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: A
this is so unfair. By assigning tags to the RG, you can still get to your resource after you assign a policy to inherit the tags from the RG. So technically, at this stage, how it is presented, this answer is not entirely false. I would have to go with Yes on this one.
upvoted 1 times
jellybiscuit
2 years, 7 months ago
They key point here is that they created the RGs for each resource type... not for each department.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
OCHT
2 years, 11 months ago
Link is correct. However , it's false to the question statements.
upvoted 2 times
AubinBakana
2 years, 8 months ago
Yes, the question is badly stated.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
g6singh
2 years, 11 months ago
Given Ans: Create a resource group for each resource type. Assign tags to each resource group. Correct Ans : NO It should be 1 or 4 resource groups and each resource will have tag as per department, i.e. Department#1, Department2 3... 4.. Also there is no mention that different department will use each others resources, even if they use, Cost would still be on resource owner.
upvoted 1 times
...
johnny19873
3 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
It's B
upvoted 1 times
...
ERROR505
3 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
It is definitely NO as tagging the resources is not available for the costs: Most Azure resources support tagging. However, some tags aren't available in Cost Management and billing. Additionally, resource group tags aren't supported. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/costs/quick-acm-cost-analysis#group-costs
upvoted 2 times
...
plmmsg
3 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
ANSWER is NO
upvoted 2 times
...
Rambo3
3 years, 2 months ago
You can create 4 RGs one for each department and to assign a tag to each one like Department1 or Department2 or Department3 or Department4. Then we put inside the RG tagged Department1 all the resources belonging to the first department and so on. Tags are inheritable, but you can use a policy to make sure a tag is copied from a RG to its resources.
upvoted 1 times
...
Tote
3 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: B
No, tags are not inhereted from Resource Groups to resources
upvoted 3 times
...
Tote
3 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: B
No, tags are not inhereted from Resource Group to the resources.
upvoted 1 times
...
[Removed]
3 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: B
This is certainly no as once you club all the resources of different department in one RG tagging the RG won't be of any help while getting cost for each dept
upvoted 1 times
...
siddjay
3 years, 3 months ago
It Says "Create a resource group for each resource type" hence we can tag individual RGs i.e. each SQL DB will be in its own RG. Hence Answer is CORRECT.
upvoted 1 times
...
ScubaDiver123456
3 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
either tag individual resources or place resources owned by a department into their own tagged resource groups
upvoted 3 times
...
jc0611
3 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
should tag individual resources rather than rg
upvoted 4 times
...
jadepe
3 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Answer: no. With the proposed solution, the tags will allow you to distinguish by resource type, not by department, which is what is needed
upvoted 3 times
...
Load full discussion...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago