Exam 70-483 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 70-483 exam

Exam 70-483 topic 2 question 73 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's 70-483

Question #: 73
Topic #: 2

HOTSPOT -
You have an existing order processing system that accepts .xml files,
The following code shows an example of a properly formatted order in XML:

You create the following class that will be serialized:

For each of the following properties, select Yes if the property is serialized according to the defined schema. Otherwise, select No.
Hot Area:

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer:

by Oziriz at Jan. 18, 2019, 2:54 p.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

testing

Highly Voted 6 years, 3 months ago

No, No ,Yes

upvoted 41 times

...

lorenzino

Highly Voted 5 years, 1 month ago

No- No- Yes Tested: [DataContract()] public class Order { [DataMember()] public int OrderID { get; set; } [DataMember(Name = "Customer")] public string CustomerName { get; set; } [DataMember()] public int CustomerId { get; set; } public DateTime OrderDate { get; set; } } Output : <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Order xmlns="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/_70_483PracticeTested" xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <Customer>Lorenzo</Customer> <CustomerId>2</CustomerId> <OrderID>1</OrderID> </Order>

upvoted 14 times

...

HgstExam

Most Recent 4 years, 9 months ago

NO - OrderId serialized as element instead of attribute NO - Orderdate not serialized when it should be YES - Customer element both serialized the same Defined Schema ---------------- <Order OrderId="42"> <Customer>Ben Smith</Customer> <CustomerID>206</CustomerID> <OrderDate>2013-04-19T09:13:14.1111-05:00</OrderDate> </Order> Serialized ----------- <Order> <OrderID>42</Orderid> <Customer>Ben Smith</Customer> <CustomerID>206</CustomerID> </Order>

upvoted 4 times

...

joaofca

4 years, 9 months ago

1) No - I think that he OrderID member should be serialized as a Element and not as a Attribute ("if the property is serialized according to the defined schema") 2) No - Because you need the [DataMemberAttribute] and CustomerDate doesn't have it, so it shoulnd't appear in the xml document 3) Yes - Because the schema defines its name as element "Customer", that does appear in the document

upvoted 2 times

noussa

4 years, 5 months ago

for the second one, it's not true case you already decorated the class with DataContract so everything will be serialized by default. DataMemeber is used for further info like(order, specific name, ....) Please do not confuse other read a bit about it before you post. Please refer to these links for further details: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.runtime.serialization.datacontractattribute?view=net-5.0 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4836683/when-to-use-datacontract-and-datamember-attributes So the answer for the second is definitely YES

upvoted 1 times

noussa

4 years, 5 months ago

Sorry I was wrong the second link of StackOverflow holds the wrong info. This is the definition from MS docs about DataContract and DataAttribte: You must also apply the DataMemberAttribute to any field, property, or event that holds values you want to serialize. By applying the DataContractAttribute, you explicitly enable the DataContractSerializer to serialize and deserialize the data. Caution You can apply the DataMemberAttribute to private fields. Be aware that the data returned by the field (even if it is private) is serialized and deserialized, and thus can be viewed or intercepted by a malicious user or process. Link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.runtime.serialization.datacontractattribute?view=net-5.0 So it's NO, NO, YES The first one is NO cause Serialization with DataContract does not support XAttribute just XElement.

upvoted 1 times

...

WasifBhatti

4 years, 11 months ago

No,No,Yes

upvoted 1 times

...

Jannie

4 years, 11 months ago

No, No, Yes

upvoted 1 times

...

nelaed

5 years, 1 month ago

Using DataContractSerializer you can't serialize field that don't have DataMember attribute but private members are ok. Yes, No, Yes. Using XMLSerializer it's YES, YES, YES - because this serializer does print every public member. I think the question might be incomplete.

upvoted 3 times

...

mmarinov

5 years, 1 month ago

NO, NO, YES!!!! The DataMember != Attribute!

upvoted 6 times

...

Sully_2020

5 years, 3 months ago

Yes, No, Yes — To prepare a class for serialization, apply the DataContractAttribute to the class. For each member of the class that returns data that you want to serialize, apply the DataMemberAttribute. You can serialize fields and properties, regardless of accessibility: private, protected, internal, protected internal, or public. To create a type that conforms to the contract, first apply the DataContractAttribute to the class. Then apply the DataMemberAttribute to every field or property that you want to serialize. ( https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.runtime.serialization.datacontractserializer?view=netframework-4.8 )

upvoted 3 times

fabio76

5 years, 1 month ago

DataMemberAttribute, by default, serialize properties as XML elements, not as XML attributes. So the answer should be NO,NO,YES If you want to serialize a property as an XML attribute must follow this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4858798/datacontract-xml-serialization-and-xml-attributes

upvoted 4 times

...