exam questions

Exam PL-400 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PL-400 exam

Exam PL-400 topic 2 question 2 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's PL-400
Question #: 2
Topic #: 2
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution. Determine whether the solution meets the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than once correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
A university implements Dynamics 365 Sales. Several departments use opportunity records to bid for funding for projects within their own departments. You configure the system to ensure that each department can only work on their own records.
Employees in multiple departments often need to work together on an opportunity. Employees report that they are not able to see opportunities from other departments.
You need to ensure that employees from more than one department can work on the same opportunities when necessary.
Solution: Create a security role that has organization-level access to opportunities. Give this security role to all members of the two departments who need access.
Does the solution meet the goal?

  • A. Yes
  • B. No
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
No_Doubt
Highly Voted 2 years, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: B
I believe the phrase "when necessary" answers the question, Organization-level means "always".
upvoted 11 times
DenisRossi
2 years, 5 months ago
Agree with you. Team templates can do the job in this case.
upvoted 2 times
...
STH
1 year, 8 months ago
The question does not say "ONLY when necessary". If you always can do something, you obviously can do it when necessary And has the question is not about if it is the best way but a working way... I think the answer is Yes
upvoted 1 times
STH
1 year, 8 months ago
my bad, it is previously said that "You configure the system to ensure that each department can only work on their own records" so you're right, bringing both requierements together it results in "only when necessary"
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
Kratinhos
Highly Voted 2 years, 9 months ago
Selected Answer: B
The way I see it is if you give organization-level access to opportunities and assign this security role to Dep 1 and Dep 2 they'll see every other department's opportunities, this isn't incorrect at all but it is inefficient for sure... use access teams instead
upvoted 6 times
...
hrshp08
Most Recent 7 months, 1 week ago
B. NO Creating a security role with organization-level access would grant access to opportunities across the entire organization, not just the selected departments. This could compromise the setup where departments are supposed to work on their own records. The more appropriate solution would involve using access team templates or sharing specific records with the necessary employees.
upvoted 1 times
...
Ak14Sep
8 months, 2 weeks ago
B. No Creating a security role with organization-level access to opportunities and assigning it to all members of the two departments would indeed allow them to see all opportunities across the organization. However, this approach might grant broader access than necessary, potentially exposing sensitive information to employees who do not need it. A more precise solution would involve configuring access at the business unit or team level, ensuring that only the relevant employees can access the necessary opportunities without overexposing data.
upvoted 1 times
...
RaviA
9 months, 1 week ago
B is correct answer
upvoted 1 times
...
At09
1 year, 8 months ago
Answer is NO
upvoted 2 times
...
dj74
1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: A
Not what you would do but it works
upvoted 1 times
...
YYCRMGuy
1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: A
While the scenario explanation says you did configure it to restrict access, users are now complaining and needing access. There are other solutions, some arguable better, but this solution would work.
upvoted 3 times
...
MikeAWS
1 year, 9 months ago
B. No Explanation: The proposed solution does not meet the goal. Giving a security role organization-level access to opportunities would grant access to all opportunities across all departments, which contradicts the requirement to ensure that each department can only work on their own records.
upvoted 2 times
...
jkaur
1 year, 10 months ago
answer should be yes
upvoted 1 times
jkaur
1 year, 9 months ago
sorry it will be NO
upvoted 1 times
...
...
700157a
1 year, 10 months ago
"Give this security role to all members of the two departments who need access" Although I don't like the solution, the solution it offers will solve the current problem. hence the answer is A.
upvoted 1 times
...
DenisRossi
2 years, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: B
No Organization-leval is like a full access... Why implement security and give all access for everyone?
upvoted 4 times
...
Fyrus
2 years, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: A
You can do that? Yes. Will it solve the problem? Yes. In my mind it's still better than the last option so use hierarchy
upvoted 1 times
...
ClairFraser
3 years ago
Selected Answer: A
Nowhere was it specified that we must constrain access to opportunities sometimes. It is just said that this is how it was configured initially.
upvoted 4 times
ding_dong
2 years, 7 months ago
You configure the system to ensure that each department can only work on their own records
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Anastasii
3 years, 7 months ago
A question from the category: is it possible to get into the street by going out the window? Possible options: yes, no. This is a closed question. The answer is yes or no, no reservations. Sure. Why it is better not to do this is another question. However, in this case, I think it's better to trust the proposed answer ...
upvoted 4 times
AzureXin
3 years, 6 months ago
Ok ka lang?
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Menwall88
3 years, 10 months ago
Strange question. Of course if we completely disregard the security concerns, which we are not asked to consider in the question, the solution does meet the goal...
upvoted 4 times
...
justraj
3 years, 11 months ago
Why not A, it does provide the solution though?
upvoted 4 times
Leila24
3 years, 11 months ago
Security issue. Organization level access makes all opportunities accessible.
upvoted 5 times
PowerRangers
2 years, 4 months ago
Isn't that the exact requirement?
upvoted 1 times
...
...
DM456
3 years, 9 months ago
In addition to what Leila24 said the question specifies "when necessary" this solution would violate that constraint.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...