Exam PL-400 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PL-400 exam

Exam PL-400 topic 2 question 11 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's PL-400

Question #: 11
Topic #: 2

HOTSPOT -
A school district wants to standardize student information and student performance records. Students in the district are assigned to a specific school. Students are evaluated using class records.
When students move between schools in the middle of a school year, the student's current class history must be available to the administrators at the new school.
You need to configure Microsoft Dataverse tables to connect the class history records to their respective class records.
How should you configure the table? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Hot Area:

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer:

by MarkusH87 at Aug. 24, 2021, 9:14 a.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

MarkusH87

Highly Voted 3 years, 4 months ago

First one should be "User or Team" as there is no option to set ownership only to "Team"

upvoted 64 times

...

piboke

Highly Voted 3 years, 1 month ago

1. "User or Team" - there is no "User" and "Team" setting 2. Many-to-one - each student has it's own class history records 3. Parental - when moving student his class history is moved with him to the new school.

upvoted 46 times

...

SSS_S_S

Most Recent 11 months, 3 weeks ago

upvoted 3 times

...

jkaur

1 year, 4 months ago

User or Team Many-to-one Referential

upvoted 3 times

jkaur

1 year, 4 months ago

third should be Parental

upvoted 4 times

...

SD29

2 years, 4 months ago

Team Many to One Parental

upvoted 4 times

...

ClairFraser

2 years, 7 months ago

like @piboke said: 1. "User or Team" - there is no "User" and "Team" setting 2. Many-to-one - each student has it's own class history records 3. Parental - so class history moves along

upvoted 14 times

...

Ram5566

3 years, 1 month ago

correct answer?

upvoted 1 times

...

KAL18

3 years, 1 month ago

Shouldn't the first one be "Organization"? Class table is some how similar to the OOB product table.

upvoted 7 times

hppp

2 years, 9 months ago

I don't think so, it's saying "Students are evaluated using class records". So the records are related to the student. With that said, we can assume the class records needs an owner.

upvoted 1 times

qub3

1 year, 4 months ago

What does ownership has anything to do with being able to relate records. You can relate Products to Opportunity without the Product record requiring an owner.

upvoted 1 times

...

BDXYZ

3 years, 2 months ago

I think Parental for item 3 so that when the student is assigned to the new school the class history records are also assigned to the new school.

upvoted 2 times

...

ETU69

3 years, 2 months ago

So, summarized: "User or Team", "Many-to-one", "Referential" :)

upvoted 7 times

powerMaster

2 years, 9 months ago

nah it should be parental because you move the student and its child items (class history) need to be moves as well. This includes the sharing of the history to the new school. Otherwise you would need to move the history manually.

upvoted 3 times

...

fakeljb3

3 years, 2 months ago

I think the 3rd one should be Referential. Parental basically means that the students will no longer exists if the History class is gone. Which school does this?

upvoted 3 times

hppp

2 years, 9 months ago

It will still exist as it wasn't mentioned that the records will be deleted, it's saying that the records will move to another school, both student and class history records. Also, it can't be Referential as only the student record will be moved and the class history will still be owned by the first school, and this is not what the requirement wants us to do.

upvoted 2 times

...

Eskape

3 years, 3 months ago

Second should be many to one since class history is intersection entity between class and student.

upvoted 35 times

KAL18

3 years, 1 month ago

Agreed. Theoretically, class history table is facilitating N:N relationship between student and class tables that is possible using two N:1 relationships. Hence, class history is related to student as N:1 relationship.

upvoted 4 times

...

lesiris

3 years, 3 months ago

I agree, in my opinion one record of class history reference only one student. So Many to One

upvoted 2 times

...

JorgeC

3 years, 3 months ago

Second one is Many-to-one as one class can have multiple tables

upvoted 4 times

...