exam questions

Exam 70-742 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 70-742 exam

Exam 70-742 topic 1 question 94 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's 70-742
Question #: 94
Topic #: 1
[All 70-742 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
Your network contains an Active Directory forest. The forest contains a domain named contoso.com. The domain contains three domain controllers.
A domain controller named lon-dc1 fails. You are unable to repair lon-dc1.
You need to prevent the other domain controllers from attempting to replicate to lon-dc1.
Solution: From Active Directory Domains and Trusts, you transfer the operations master roles from lon-dc1.
Does this meet the goal?

  • A. Yes
  • B. No
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Charchar
Highly Voted 5 years, 8 months ago
I think this should be wrong. You can't tansfer a role from a failed DC, only seize it. The only way to seize a role is using ntdsutil
upvoted 14 times
GenjamBhai
4 years, 10 months ago
B is ok. Transfer/seize FSMO role will not stop replication.
upvoted 4 times
...
KLOS
4 years, 6 months ago
First seize then transfer via ntdsuitil
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Justin0020
Highly Voted 5 years, 1 month ago
Answer is No, this MUST be done with Powershell (Move-ADDirectoryServerMasterRole -Force) or with NTDSUTIL and Seize *role*
upvoted 8 times
...
GoldenFox
Most Recent 4 years, 5 months ago
Q.105 From AD, remove object of lon-dc1  No Q.106 From AD ST, transfer operations master roles from lon-dc1  No Q.107 From ntdsutil.exe, perform metadata cleanup  Yes Q.156 From AD, remove computer account of lon-dc1  Yes Q.231 From AD DT, transfer the operations master roles from lon-dc1  No
upvoted 3 times
GoldenFox
4 years, 5 months ago
Q.5 From AD SS, remove object of lon-dc1  Yes Q.6 From AD ST, transfer operations master roles from lon-dc1  No Q.7 From ntdsutil.exe, perform metadata cleanup  Yes
upvoted 1 times
...
...
mikl
4 years, 5 months ago
Agreed here. This question is weird. 1. You cant transfer FSMO roles from a DC that is failed. FSMO roles in that particular case has to be seized. 2. Replication to other DC will occur whatever or not the hold FSMO roles.
upvoted 1 times
...
Kamikazekiller
4 years, 11 months ago
Correct answer: B
upvoted 2 times
...
Timock
5 years ago
The stated task is to stop the DC's from attempting to replicate to LON-DC1. Moving a FSMO role does NOT accomplish this. Also, since the server holding the role (DC1) is down you cannot 'transfer' the role you would have to 'sieze' it. So in both directions wrong wrong wrong.
upvoted 5 times
FNavarro
4 years, 6 months ago
Lol. I'm glad someone said this. Everyone is circle jerking that you can transfer FSMO role from failed DC. Ummm... why would that matter, no FSMO role is responsible for replication.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
jelly_baby
5 years ago
Read the question. The goal is to stop replication. Transferring the Master roles has nothing to do with that. Answer is B.
upvoted 3 times
...
ve22
5 years, 1 month ago
Or only :"From Active Directory Users and Computes, you remove the object of lon-dc1" ?
upvoted 1 times
...
ve22
5 years, 1 month ago
Does :"From Active Directory Sites and Services, you remove the object of lon-dc1" do the job?!?
upvoted 2 times
alexnt
4 years, 7 months ago
No, it doesn't.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
khalid86
5 years, 1 month ago
Answer is B. You can't tansfer a role from a failed DC.
upvoted 2 times
...
AZ764
5 years, 2 months ago
Definitely NO, but not for the reasons listed. The goal here is to STOP REPLICATION to the failed DC. Simply moving the roles would not stop this... To stop replication you would have to remove the site links. Regardless, the DC is dead, so no replication is happening anyway, so you'd want those roles seized. Beyond this, you couldn't transfer the roles, they would have to be seized.
upvoted 5 times
...
Nhan
5 years, 3 months ago
after carefully research the given answer is wrong, because from the Active Directory Domains and Trust, you must connect to the Domain controller before you can transfer the Operational master, in this case the DcLondon01 is fail, which is offline, therefore the correct answer is NO which is B. Please disregard my previous statement even though you are still be able to transfer the operational master using power shell with the-force command in case the current operational master holder is offline
upvoted 3 times
...
Nhan
5 years, 3 months ago
You can transfer operations master roles to another domain controller server by using PowerShell even the current domain controller holding the operations master roles is downed using PowerShell. But you won’t be able to move the schema master if the server is down
upvoted 2 times
...
Nhan
5 years, 4 months ago
The answer is correct, you will not be able to transfer forest schema master if the server is fail, but you can definitely transfer or make another domain controller become a naming master buy using PowerShell
upvoted 2 times
...
xziomal9
5 years, 6 months ago
Correct answer: B
upvoted 5 times
...
panda
5 years, 7 months ago
In addition,My understand is that in case of domain controller fails GUI can't be used to seize and only PowerShell can be used to taht.
upvoted 5 times
...
christovski
5 years, 7 months ago
agreed
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...