Exam MB-240 topic 1 question 24 discussion

It should be Resource Crew. Although both Resource Crew, and Requirement Groups (multi-resource) allows to bundle resources, Requirement Groups will provide you alternatives (i.e. for day 1 - Res A, and Res B; for day 2 - Res A, and Res C). The question refers that the resources will work together for a set number of days..., meaning that you cannot select (i.e. for day 1 - Res A, and Res B; for day 2 - Res A, and Res C), meaning that if you want to use Resource Groups, you need to manually select and book them for all individual days. With Crews, you assure that you'll be always using the same resources.

It could be B and C right? B if they are doing different tasks and C if it's the same stuff. Or am I mistaken?

Correct answer base on link

In exam, Jun-22

C, based on references given

C - Resource Crew

Resource Crew

C is correct because of the duration factor. Requirement groups don't have that

Correct ans is C as per https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/field-service/resource-crews Crews are ideal for scenarios where: a group of resources will work together for a set number of days, weeks, or months.

My only thought here is that is doesn't say "named resources" or "specific resources" which would definitely be a crew...It just says "a group of resources", which now makes me think resource group is correct.

B is correct. Requirement groups allow us to define groups of resources that would be APPROPRIATE for a job and to then schedule all those resources with a single search. We can mix and match the different types of resources—such as individual field technicians, a whole crew, equipment, or facilities—needed for a job. Crews can be an option for fulfilling requirement groups. However, a crew might have more resources than required by the requirement group and will therefore rank lower in schedule assistant search results.

The link is talking how this can be achieved with Requirements groups but its not an option. So think think awnser C (Crews) is more correct.