Exam MB-310 topic 7 question 3 discussion

If the question is about the configuration that determines the processing outcome, Option A is correct because it enforces stricter control (requiring approval), aligning with the three-way match policy. another intrepretaion is - If the question is about the configuration that failed to stop the error’s impact, Option E could be seen as problematic because it’s too permissive. A warning might not be sufficient to catch a USD9,000 discrepancy, especially in a high-stakes intercompany context.

I understand the question so, that they are asking how it could have happend. So the right answer would be D. Matching is not setup....

A and C, I believe.

Requirement: Canadian franchises require a three-way-match on all purchases except paper products, which have a 10-percent price tolerance. Answer: A

Requirements says = Canadian franchises require a three-way-match on all purchases except paper products, which have a 10-percent price tolerance. I think correct answer is A because Canadian Franchises buy ski equipment, not paper products with tolerance, so this invoice should have three-way matching and discrepancies need be approved

I think the answer should be BCD. Because it validates the invoice amount VS purchase order amount, and BCD does that.