HOTSPOT - You need to recommend components to meet the re-inspection requirements. Which components should you recommend? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point. Hot Area:
Suggested Answer:
Box 1: Power Automate flow - Scenario: Inspection orders must be automatically marked for re-inspection should a machine fail inspection. The new inspection order must be created by using the originating inspection order as a template.
Box 2: Business rule - By combining conditions and actions, you can do any of the following with business rules: ✑ Set column values ✑ Clear column values
Set column requirement levels - ✑ Show or hide columns ✑ Enable or disable columns ✑ Validate data and show error messages ✑ Create business recommendations based on business intelligence. Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/maker/data-platform/data-platform-create-business-rule
Re-inspection orders: Power automate Flow
Inspection ratings: Sounds like a strong case for a Rollup field that aggregate values across table columns. Also not limited to a single table. I go with D
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/customerengagement/on-premises/customize/define-rollup-fields?view=op-9-1
In case study it states that if one metric for a given machine is failed then set it as failed. So if the entity relations are set up correctly the field that is tied to another entity this can be handled by a Business Rule.
So it is Correct.
Inspection orders must: Be automatically marked as failed if one inspection step rating is marked as failed. rating type (pass, fail)
no case for rollup. Assumption: on the same entity. --> Business Rule.
1. power automate flow
2. BR, it literally says set the value automatically. Now while I realize a roll up could do that, that doesnt mean the rollup would create the right number. For all we know fail = 342.33 which means you need a BR to set the actual value it would be
On the 2nd question around inspection ratings, I don't think it can be a rollup field as rollup fields are about aggregating rather than cycling through and acting upon each record. They can also take 12 hours to run.
I think what it comes down to how you interpret the text, is this all fields on a single entity or an overall inspection entity, linked to another entity with a list of quality checks. Each quality check will be different, so it would be a single record with multiple questions, linked to a single inspection record, which would be.....weird. 1:1.
I therefore think the inspection record and all checklist items must be on a single record, and then a business rule should do it.
"Standardized checklists must be stored in the solution for use by inspectors. A copy must be created when a new inspection is initiated" - so inspections are a grid of records that needs to be loaded initially and then using an editable grid - marked for pass or fail. So the second answer must be Rollup field
1. Power automate flow
2. Custom Action, Reason: Automatically marked as failed if one inception step rating is marked as failed. For this requirement we cannot access parent records from child record using business rule. We can call custom action from javascript to update the parent status
It doesn’t say it’s in separate tables? Business rule can compare columns with conditions.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.PL-600 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
baughfell
Highly Voted 2 years, 5 months agoNewb007
1 year, 7 months agodudenKo
2 years, 3 months agoWhataboutno
Highly Voted 2 years, 5 months agoMrEz
Most Recent 9 months agoMEG_Florida
1 year, 5 months agoKaDevi
1 year, 9 months agoOldHand1
2 years agoClairFraser
2 years, 2 months agoIcky
2 years, 4 months agohup
2 years, 7 months agoVJ345
2 years, 7 months agooriginalwitness
2 years, 6 months ago