Exam PL-400 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PL-400 exam

Exam PL-400 topic 2 question 16 discussion

Actual exam question from Microsoft's PL-400

Question #: 16
Topic #: 2

DRAG DROP -
A company is creating a new system based on the Microsoft Dataverse.
You need to select the Dataverse features that meet the company's requirements.
Which features should you select? To answer, drag the appropriate features to the correct requirements. Each feature may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may needs to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Select and Place:

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer:

by Premm at Sept. 11, 2022, 7:39 a.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

Premm

Highly Voted 2 years, 9 months ago

I think, first one should be Parental, second is correct, Last one should be referential

upvoted 36 times

lionelKevin

1 year ago

c'est excatement ca, le premier parental, et le dernier referenfiel. la difference est sur obligation de la table de referencement

upvoted 1 times

...

pey

1 year, 1 month ago

The last one should be referential, restrict delete. This ensures that associated records are not deleted, and deletion is restricted.

upvoted 1 times

...

zukito3

2 years, 9 months ago

Yes, becauce the documentation says: "Referential. In a referential relationship between two entities, you can navigate to any related records, but actions taken on one will not affect the other." and Parental says "In a parental relationship between two tables, any action taken on a record of the parent table is also taken on any child table records that are related to the primary (or parent) table record. For example, the owner of the parent record has inherited access to the child table records and when the parent record is deleted, all of the child records will also be deleted.". The suggested answer would be: 1. Parental 2.Cascade 3.Referential https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/customerengagement/on-premises/customize/create-and-edit-1n-relationships?view=op-9-1

upvoted 15 times

...

northstar88

Highly Voted 2 years, 9 months ago

Parental Cascade User Owned Referential

upvoted 19 times

Flatternschuchtern

2 years, 9 months ago

Correct my man

upvoted 2 times

...

sugaSri

Most Recent 3 weeks, 6 days ago

When a record is assigned to a user, all referencing active records must also be assigned to the same user- parental. Parental behavior cascades actions like assign, delete, share, etc., from the parent to the child records. So, when the parent record is assigned, all related child records (e.g., active tasks, contacts, etc.) are also automatically assigned to the same user. Why the others are incorrect: A. Referential: No cascading. Child records are unaffected by changes to the parent. B. Referential, Restrict Delete: Prevents deletion of the parent if child records exist, but does not cascade assign. D. Cascade User-Owned: Only cascades assign if the child record is owned by the same user as the parent — which doesn't guarantee all active records will be reassigned.

upvoted 1 times

...

itmaxuser

2 months, 2 weeks ago

Parental Cascade User Owned Referential

upvoted 1 times

...

Juan0414

3 months, 3 weeks ago

First one: Parental Second one: It should be Cascade Active (It says ALL REFERENCING ACTIVE records), but as that is not an option we should go with the one that ensures that this is covered, and that option would be "Parental" (User owned may leave behind active records associated with the primary record but that are not owned by the current user) Third one: Referential (The record should be able to be deleted and that can not happen if it is restrict delete)

upvoted 2 times

...

gills

9 months, 2 weeks ago

Parential Cascade User Owner Referential, Restrict Referential: No changes on the related entity record (Delete: Remove Link,Merge: Cascade All) Referential, Restrict Delete: Same as Referential (except it restrict deletion). Configurable Cascading: Manually configure Cascading.

upvoted 2 times

...

iamdeepshekhar

1 year, 2 months ago

It should be : 1. Parental 2. Cascade Active : Not the cascade user owned as Cascade active definition says "Perform the action on all active referencing entity records associated with the referenced entity record." 3. Referential

upvoted 1 times

...

SSS_S_S

1 year, 5 months ago

1. Parental 2.Cascade 3.Referential

upvoted 1 times

...

YYCRMGuy

1 year, 9 months ago

Parental - must delete the related records Parental - it says "all referencing entities" not just the ones owned by the same user. Actually "Cascade Active, but since that's not an option Parental is closer that Cascade User Owned since it will at least catch all. Referential, as it mentioned the delete should work, but not delete the child records.

upvoted 2 times

...

BabySheep_

1 year, 10 months ago

1.Parental 2.Cascade user onwed 3.Referentail - Rectricted delete

upvoted 6 times

...

jkaur

1 year, 10 months ago

1. Parental 2.Cascade 3.Referential

upvoted 1 times

...

ziggy1117

1 year, 11 months ago

Parental, Cascade User Owned, Referential

upvoted 2 times

...

vf23

2 years, 1 month ago

Question 1 is ambiguous. Both Parental and Referential RD are possible. For example, Employee and SalaryPayable is Referential RD. The boss MUST pay off aemployee and clear the record on SalaryPayable before fire him/her. Parental won't work here.

upvoted 1 times

...

justin_s

2 years, 5 months ago

It's weird because the second one should be Cascade Active and not is an option.

upvoted 6 times

qub3

1 year, 10 months ago

I second this. It is shocking that everybody is just agreeing to Cascade User Owned when infact all it does is Cascade the effects to the child records already owned by the user. Cascade Active should be the right answer which is not even listed here as an option.

upvoted 1 times

...

No_Doubt

2 years, 7 months ago

1- Parental Since in the parental, delete is set to cascade all 2- Configurable cascading Cascade user-owned 3- Referential Cannot be parental, since we need to keep the associated records. In the other hand, cannot be "Referential, Restrict Delete", since the question is saying that parent record will be deleted and children will stay (remove link)!

upvoted 12 times

rober13

2 years, 6 months ago

thanks for explanation. It is correct.

upvoted 4 times

...

Elliot4565

2 years, 9 months ago

Third should be parental. Parental means that any action taken on the parent will also be taken on the children. Cascade User-owned means that any action taken on the parent will also be taken on the children owned by the user who made the action on the parent.

upvoted 1 times

...