Exam SC-300 topic 1 question 38 discussion

user.usageLocation -in ["US","AU"] == User 1 & User 3 -and (user.department -eq "Sales") == User 1 & User 3 -and -not (user.jobTitle -eq "Manager") == User 1 –or (user. jobTitle -eq "SalesRep")

D is correct always resolve acording to precedence, first all the -and operators, only after that the -or operators. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/enterprise-users/groups-dynamic-membership#operator-precedence

User1 & User2

A. User1 only: user.usageLocation -in ["US","AU"] -and (user.department -eq "Sales") -and -not (user.jobTitle -eq "Manager") –or (user.jobTitle -eq "SalesRep") This rule includes users who: Have a usage location in “US” or “AU”. Are in the Sales department. Are not Managers. Or have the job title “SalesRep”: User1: Located in the United States, department is Sales, job title is Associate. Meets the location (US) and department (Sales) criteria, and is not a Manager. User2: Located in Finland, department is Sales, job title is SalesRep. Does not meet the location criteria (Finland), but meets the job title “SalesRep”. User3: Located in Australia, department is Sales, job title is Manager. Meets the location (AU) and department (Sales) criteria, but is excluded because HE is a Manager..

Tested D is correct. Have to replace dashes with hyphen's for code to work properly. (user.usageLocation -in ["US", "AU"]) -and (user.department -eq "Sales") -and -not (user.jobTitle -eq "Manager") -or (user.jobTitle -eq "SalesRep")

None of them are right, but if you enter the Dyn group code in proper format it only pulls User1. Tested, I get an error invalid character using code the provided. After reformatting to "(user.usageLocation -in ["US","AU"]) -and (user.department -eq "Sales") -and ((user.jobTitle -ne "Manager") -or (user.jobTitle -eq "SalesRep"))" it only pulls User1

-and without brackets men's that only one condition is taken to -and

Desglosemos la regla: user.usageLocation -in [“US”, “AU”]: El usuario debe estar en Estados Unidos (US) o Australia (AU). -and (user.department -eq “Sales”): El usuario debe pertenecer al departamento de ventas (Sales). -and -not (user.jobTitle -eq “Manager”): El usuario no debe tener el título de trabajo “Manager”. –or (user.jobTitle -eq “SalesRep”): O el usuario debe tener el título de trabajo “SalesRep”.

D (User1 and user2) is the correct answer. Confirmed in a Test Lab.

User1 from user.usageLocation -in ["US","AU"] -and (user.department -eq "Sales") -and -not (user.jobTitle -eq "Manager") User2 from or (user. jobTitle -eq "SalesRep")

Tested this day : Answer D

What confusing here is OR statement. To make it simple: OR is not part of NOT it's separate statement. If you read this way answer D is correct.

user.usageLocation -in ["US","AU"]: This part checks if the usage location of the user is either in the United States ("US") or Australia ("AU"). -and (user.department -eq "Sales"): It checks if the user's department is "Sales". -and -not (user.jobTitle -eq "Manager"): This part ensures that the user's job title is not "Manager". -or (user.jobTitle -eq "SalesRep"): This part checks if the user's job title is "SalesRep". Putting it all together: The command checks if the user's usage location is either in the US or Australia, their department is "Sales", and they are not a "Manager". If all these conditions are met, the user is included. Additionally, if the user's job title is "SalesRep", regardless of the previous conditions, they are also included.

when you put the command as is in to azure you will get an error ,The actual syntax should be "user.usageLocation -in ["US","AU"] -and (user.department -eq "Sales") -and -not (user.jobTitle -eq "Manager") or (user.jobTitle -eq "SalesRep")" and this gives us a user1 and user2 i tried it out myself , Poorly designed question

((user's location is US or AU) AND (their department is SALES) AND (their job title is NOT Manager)) (OR their job title is SalesRep.)

Correct Answer is D.

Because of the Or statement