Exam PMI-PBA topic 1 question 79 discussion

Actual exam question from PMI's PMI-PBA

Question #: 79
Topic #: 1

A project that was ongoing well for the last few months has encountered a situation-regulatory authorities have deemed that the project does not meet their requirements. Although regulatory requirements were identified during an earlier phase of the project, there is no substantial evidence to prove that the requirements were formally rejected.
This could have been avoided if:

A. the customer met with regulatory authorities to verify that their requirements were also considered.
B. a change control process for requirements and their statuses was followed.
C. the project manager circulated the meeting minutes after the discussions with all the attendees.
D. the project team documented customer requests and obtained sign-off.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

by giushki at March 20, 2023, 10:03 a.m.

Comments

Submit Cancel

AlphaD

6 months, 3 weeks ago

B is the best answer

upvoted 2 times

...

giushki

8 months, 3 weeks ago

Selected Answer: B

The situation could have been avoided if option B, "a change control process for requirements and their statuses was followed." A change control process for requirements and their statuses is a formal process for managing changes to project requirements. This process typically includes identifying the requirements that need to be changed, documenting the proposed changes, evaluating the impact of the changes, obtaining approval for the changes, and implementing the changes.

upvoted 4 times

...