exam questions

Exam PMP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PMP exam

Exam PMP topic 1 question 232 discussion

Actual exam question from PMI's PMP
Question #: 232
Topic #: 1
[All PMP Questions]

An oil and gas project started without having acquired full funding for the project. The remaining funds were to be acquired during project execution. The acquisition of the remaining funds was delayed several months, resulting in a suspension of work by all contractors.
What should the project manager have done to prevent this from happening?

  • A. Ensured the stakeholder anticipated obstacles to achieving financial closure on the remaining funds.
  • B. Ensured the risk was adequately assessed and mitigated by the appropriate stakeholders.
  • C. Ensured the stakeholder who was providing additional funds remained interested in the project.
  • D. Ensured the project team monitored and reviewed the project risk register periodically.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
josephsafiran
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
The project manager should have **B. Ensured the risk was adequately assessed and mitigated by the appropriate stakeholders**. This approach would have identified the potential delay in funding as a significant risk to the project. Once identified, the project manager could have worked with the stakeholders to develop a risk mitigation plan. This could have included securing additional funding sources, adjusting the project schedule, or developing a contingency plan in case the funding was delayed. This proactive approach to risk management could have prevented the suspension of work by the contractors.
upvoted 4 times
...
Lucky_Cindy
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Ensured the risk was adequately assessed and mitigated by the appropriate stakeholders
upvoted 1 times
...
Only12go
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Ensured the risk was adequately assessed and mitigated by the appropriate stakeholders. Explanation: Starting a project without full funding in place is inherently risky. The best course of action the project manager could take is to ensure that this significant risk was identified, adequately assessed, and appropriate mitigation plans were in place. Involving the right stakeholders in this process is crucial since they could have insights or resources to deal with this particular risk.
upvoted 2 times
...
Alizade
1 year, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: B
The correct answer is: B. Ensured the risk was adequately assessed and mitigated by the appropriate stakeholders.
upvoted 1 times
...
sam1721
1 year, 2 months ago
This is a significant risk and having a mitgation strategy makes most sense.
upvoted 1 times
...
victory108
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Ensured the risk was adequately assessed and mitigated by the appropriate stakeholders
upvoted 1 times
...
SteAle
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Ensured the risk was adequately assessed and mitigated by the appropriate stakeholders.
upvoted 2 times
...
TomGrey
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Clearly there was a risk that funds during project execution may have been delayed, and was not mitigated. All other options apart from B would not have prevented the risk from affecting the project.
upvoted 1 times
...
MattAnya
1 year, 6 months ago
I select B The project should have anticipated and ensured that there was plan to mitigate the risk before the project starts
upvoted 2 times
...
JMCCRAY
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: A
The correct answer would be A. Ensured the stakeholder anticipated obstacles to achieving financial closure on the remaining funds. One of the key responsibilities of a project manager is to ensure that the project has adequate funding to support its completion. In this scenario, the project started without having acquired full funding for the project, which was a risk that could have been identified during the planning phase of the project. To prevent such a situation from happening, the project manager should have identified potential risks associated with funding and worked with the appropriate stakeholders to mitigate those risks. This would have involved assessing the funding requirements of the project, identifying potential sources of funding, and developing a strategy for acquiring the necessary funds.
upvoted 3 times
cwilson91
1 year, 5 months ago
B is the correct answer: By adequately assessing and mitigating the risk related to funding, the project manager could have taken proactive measures to address the potential delay in acquiring the remaining funds Option A, ensuring the stakeholder anticipated obstacles to achieving financial closure on the remaining funds, is related to effective stakeholder management. While it is important to involve stakeholders in anticipating potential obstacles, the primary responsibility lies with the project manager to proactively assess and mitigate risks.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...