ExamTopics Logo
Mail Us[email protected]
Menu
Pmi Discussions
exam questions

Exam PMI-ACP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PMI-ACP exam
Go to Exam

Exam PMI-ACP topic 1 question 311 discussion

Actual exam question from PMI's PMI-ACP
Question #: 311
Topic #: 1
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

A new Scrum team is struggling with the various ceremonies of Scrum. Among other things, the product owner and stakeholders find the technical architecture and design presentations during sprint reviews less than informative.

What should the team do?

  • A. Refocus the sprint review meetings to demonstrate working software and seek feedback on the product.
  • B. Reach out to other, more experienced teams to seek input as to how to present the technical details in a more informative manner.
  • C. Explain the importance of the technical architecture and design presentations and improve the presentation format.
  • D. Invite technical managers and architects who will be a more appropriate audience to their sprint reviews.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️
by daichou at Aug. 30, 2023, 6:15 a.m.

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Submit Cancel
thewalker
10 months ago
Selected Answer: A
The primary purpose of sprint reviews is to showcase the working software and gather feedback from stakeholders about the product, not to delve deeply into technical architecture and design details. By refocusing the sprint review meetings on demonstrating the actual product and its features, the team can align better with stakeholder expectations and gather valuable feedback on the product's usability and functionality. B: While seeking input from experienced teams can be helpful, the core issue is not about presentation format but about aligning the focus of the sprint reviews with stakeholder needs. C: Improving the presentation format of technical details might not address the underlying issue if stakeholders are not interested in technical details during the sprint reviews. D: Inviting technical managers and architects might not be the best solution if the main audience of the sprint reviews is the stakeholders interested in the product's functionality and usability.
upvoted 1 times
...
yassoraa88
10 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
A is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
Emily87
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: A
A is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
chlaithem
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: B
While Option A (focusing on software) aligns with the core purpose of sprint reviews, it doesn't directly address the team's specific difficulty with presenting technical details effectively. Combining Option B with A ensures both user-centric feedback and clear technical communication. Therefore, seeking external input on presenting technical details provides the most targeted approach to address the team's immediate concern while still fulfilling the broader purpose of sprint reviews.
upvoted 1 times
...
MattAnya
1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: A
A is the correct answer
upvoted 1 times
...
Nervys
1 year, 7 months ago
A for sure
upvoted 1 times
...
Petrevski
1 year, 10 months ago
Selected Answer: A
A = correct
upvoted 1 times
...
daichou
1 year, 10 months ago
Selected Answer: B
This will help the team to get feedback from people who have experience with sprint reviews and who can help them to improve their presentation skills.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel