Exam PMP topic 1 question 955 discussion

Its cannot be D. If Definition of Done includes a code review, then this does not prevent the development of functions for which the team is not getting paid. In fact, they would only find out once they are "done". A information radiator ensures everyone is aligned on what functions are needed and the required specs. Thus C is the answer.

C. Ensure that the task board is used as an information radiator and all stories have enough detail to build the required feature or function

Cette option permet de garantir que chaque tâche et user story est clairement définie et bien documentée, ce qui aide à éviter les malentendus concernant les exigences du produit. Ainsi, si une fonctionnalité est explicitement demandée et définie, les développeurs n'auront aucune raison de travailler sur des embellissements non demandés, et le travail effectué pourra être facilement justifié et rémunéré. En outre, en utilisant le tableau des tâches de cette manière, on s'assure que l'information est visible pour tous les membres de l'équipe, y compris le chef de produit, ce qui favorise une communication transparente et une compréhension commune des priorités et des attentes.

The development team and scrum master should take steps to ensure they are paid for all their work by making sure that the work being done is clearly requested, understood, and documented. The best option to achieve this is Option C. This option ensures transparency and clarity. By using the task board effectively and ensuring that all user stories are detailed and clear, the team can avoid misunderstandings and unrequested embellishments. It makes sure that everyone is on the same page regarding what is required, thereby ensuring that all work done is requested and can be billed accordingly. By the way, the DoD focuses on quality and completeness of tasks but does not prevent the addition of unrequested features.

C. Ensure that the task board is used as an information radiator and all stories have enough detail to build the required feature or function. By using the task board as an information radiator and ensuring all user stories have sufficient detail, the development team can make sure that only the requested and approved work is performed, thus ensuring they are paid for all the work they complete. D is wrong because, it primarily focuses on ensuring that completed work meets quality standards and includes verification reviews.

DoD only confirm acceptance criteria. if task is bulit for embellishments, it still can satisfy DoD.

To ensure that the development team is paid for all their work, it's crucial to refine the definition of done (DoD) for user stories. The DoD specifies the criteria that must be met for a user story to be considered complete. By including a verification review of the code as part of the DoD, the development team ensures that their work is formally reviewed and accepted before considering the user story done. This not only helps maintain the quality of the product but also provides a clear and agreed-upon definition of what constitutes completion, reducing the likelihood of disputes over payment for work.

By refining the definition of done (DoD), the development team can explicitly include the requirement that the completion of user stories involves a verification review of the code. This helps in ensuring that the work is not only completed but also meets the required quality standards. It provides a basis for the development team to demonstrate that they have fulfilled their responsibilities, making it more justifiable to be paid for their work.

Refining the Definition of Done (DoD) is a common practice in Agile methodologies, including Scrum. The DoD outlines the criteria that must be met for a user story to be considered complete. By including a verification review of the code as part of the completion criteria, the development team ensures that the work is not only done but also meets the required quality standards. This allows the team to claim compensation for their work and provides transparency to the product manager about the completeness and quality of each user story.

D is the answer. To secure fair compensation for all work, including unrequested embellishments, the development team and scrum master can take a proactive step by refining the definition of done (DoD) for user stories (Option D). By incorporating a verification review of the code as part of the completion criteria, the team establishes a formalized process for ensuring the quality and completeness of their work. This not only aligns with Agile principles of delivering high-quality, potentially shippable increments but also communicates a clear expectation to the product manager regarding the necessary steps for compensation.

Detailed user stories prevents unauthorized work. Task board is used a information radiator so everything is transperent.

Product Manager states that no unrequested fancy/decorative feature should be developed. D is to refine DoD for user stories in order to have verification of code. How code review will ensure no fancy feature is developed? A and C also do not mention on how to ensure that unrequested fancy features are not developed. B seems most suitable option as here it is ensured that user stories meet the mentioned requirement.

Its D. It shows that the team is on track and no unwanted or additional work is handled.