A company is moving from a predictive to an adaptive approach. How should the company now translate the already planned work breakdown structure (WBS) to adaptive iterations?
A.
Accept this limitation and perform accordingly since the WBS can only be used in Scrum iterations.
B.
Consider reforming the structure of the company first as it is difficult for a company to transition from predictive to adaptive methods.
C.
Save the WBS in the historical data as the information can only be used for educational purposes and not as inputs for creating user stories.
D.
Create a product backlog with the information depicted in the WBS and prioritize the newly developed user stories into iterations.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Accept this limitation and perform accordingly since the WBS can only be used in Scrum iterations.
➤ Incorrect. The WBS is not limited to Scrum; its content can be reinterpreted and restructured into backlog items across any adaptive framework.
B. Consider reforming the structure of the company first as it is difficult for a company to transition from predictive to adaptive methods.
➤ Incorrect. Organizational change may be needed, but this doesn’t answer the question about how to transition the WBS into iterations.
C. Save the WBS in the historical data as the information can only be used for educational purposes and not as inputs for creating user stories.
➤ Incorrect. This wastes valuable planning and falsely assumes the WBS can't be converted into backlog items.
upvoted 1 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CAPM Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
JesseChou_123
1 month ago