Exam CAPM topic 1 question 435 discussion

Explanation: When a business analyst is evaluating solutions, logging defects, and preparing for a go/no-go decision, the next logical step is to gather more information to understand why the discrepancies exist. This makes elicitation the appropriate starting technique — it involves interacting with stakeholders to uncover root causes, clarify issues, and collect additional insights. Why the others are incorrect: A. Cost-benefit analysis: Useful for comparing the economic pros and cons of solutions but not ideal for uncovering root causes of defects. B. Feasibility analysis: Determines if a solution is viable, but doesn't directly help analyze specific discrepancies. C. Opportunity analysis: Identifies potential areas for improvement or advantage, not used for problem diagnosis.

B. Análisis de viabilidad El análisis de viabilidad es fundamental para evaluar si las soluciones propuestas son factibles en términos de recursos, costos, tiempo y capacidades. Esto ayuda a identificar cualquier discrepancia entre los resultados esperados y los recursos o limitaciones disponibles, lo cual es crucial antes de tomar una decisión de seguir adelante o no.

C. Opportunity analysis Opportunity analysis is more suitable for identifying problem areas after discrepancies are noted.

D. Elicitation. Elicitation is gathering information from stakeholders to understand their perspectives, needs, and requirements.