During the requirements verification process, stakeholders are finding many errors in the requirements definition. What could the business analyst have done to avoid these errors?
A.
Asked the stakeholders to write the requirements themselves
B.
Updated the requirements traceability matrix
C.
Included the project manager in the elicitation sessions
D.
Confirmed the elicitation results after sessions
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Asked the stakeholders to write the requirements themselves:
❌ Stakeholders often don’t have the skills or time to write formal requirements; it's the business analyst’s role to translate their needs.
B. Updated the requirements traceability matrix:
❌ Useful for tracking requirements, but doesn’t help with avoiding errors during definition.
C. Included the project manager in the elicitation sessions:
❌ May help with coordination, but the project manager is not responsible for validating the accuracy of stakeholder requirements.
D. Confirmed the elicitation results after sessions
By validating the elicitation outcomes with stakeholders, the business analyst ensures accuracy and alignment with their needs. This verification process helps catch errors early and promotes a shared understanding of requirements
upvoted 1 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CAPM Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
JesseChou_123
1Â month, 2Â weeks agoVangelis_1980
1Â year ago