Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Historical quality standards and past organizational projects
❌ These may inform planning but are not the governing framework. The plan aligns with current organizational quality systems.
B. Product sponsor's expectation of organizational quality
❌ The sponsor's expectations are important, but the organization’s formal quality policies and standards take precedence and define what is acceptable.
D. Organizational quality policies, stakeholder expectations, and historical data
❌ Close, but historical data and stakeholder expectations are inputs or considerations, not what the plan is managed in accordance with. The key alignment is with policies, standards, and methodologies.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Historical quality standards and past organizational projects
➤ These can inform the plan but are not the primary framework the plan aligns with.
B. Product sponsor's expectation of organizational quality
➤ Sponsor expectations are important but are not a comprehensive framework for quality management.
D. Organizational quality policies, stakeholder expectations, and historical data
➤ While this option sounds reasonable, "stakeholder expectations" and "historical data" are inputs or considerations—not formal guiding standards like policies, standards, and methodologies.
upvoted 1 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.CAPM Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
JesseChou_123
1 month, 1 week agoJesseChou_123
1 month, 2 weeks agoJesseChou_123
1 month, 2 weeks ago