exam questions

Exam PMI-ACP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PMI-ACP exam

Exam PMI-ACP topic 1 question 108 discussion

Actual exam question from PMI's PMI-ACP
Question #: 108
Topic #: 1
[All PMI-ACP Questions]

A product owner feels that the last sprint failed to sufficiently deliver what was valuable to their organization's overall project goals.
What should the scrum master mention at the next retrospective?

  • A. Solutions to project problems that were built into the last sprint
  • B. Problems that arose
  • C. Solutions that saved the organizations the most time and money
  • D. Problems that were solved
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
HTTPS
Highly Voted 2 years, 5 months ago
A - Correct From The Scrum Guide: “Sprint Retrospective The purpose of the Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness. The Scrum Team inspects how the last Sprint went with regards to individuals, interactions, processes, tools, and their Definition of Done. Inspected elements often vary with the domain of work. Assumptions that led them astray are identified and their origins explored. The Scrum Team discusses what went well during the Sprint, what problems it encountered, and how those problems were (or were not) solved.”
upvoted 8 times
...
Petrevski
Most Recent 6 months, 4 weeks ago
B = correct. According to the Scrum Guide: The purpose of the Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness. The Scrum Team inspects how the last Sprint went with regards to individuals, interactions, processes, tools, and their Definition of Done. Inspected elements often vary with the domain of work. Assumptions that led them astray are identified and their origins explored. The Scrum Team discusses what went well during the Sprint, what problems it encountered, and how those problems were (or were not) solved. The Scrum Team identifies the most helpful changes to improve its effectiveness. The most impactful improvements are addressed as soon as possible. They may even be added to the Sprint Backlog for the next Sprint.
upvoted 1 times
...
Minhha3
7 months, 2 weeks ago
Vote B
upvoted 1 times
...
InvisibleBeing
10 months ago
Selected Answer: B
I am sticking with B.
upvoted 1 times
...
Alb65
1 year, 2 months ago
B : We need to go over all problems specially those ones that was not solved , and caused the problem .
upvoted 1 times
...
richck102
1 year, 3 months ago
i vote B
upvoted 1 times
richck102
1 year, 3 months ago
i vote again ....A
upvoted 2 times
...
...
Bakayalo
2 years, 5 months ago
B. As it question bout : failed to sufficiently deliver what was valuable to their organization's overall project goals - seems should highlight the problem to improve the next
upvoted 3 times
...
Mokel
2 years, 11 months ago
The product owner feels that there was no real value added in the last sprint. Two possibilities why this is the case: - No value was added - The product owner did not see the value For the latter, the Product Owner maybe should be made aware of the value that was added by letting him know which problems were solved. Also 'what went well' should also be part of the retrospective. I am sure it is not (C). But the other three makes sense to me.
upvoted 2 times
srv3
2 years, 11 months ago
Retrospective is the event to improve processess. It could/should evaluate decisions from the last retro. A. Solutions to project problems that were built into the last sprint > Answer about delivery = "built into the last sprint". It should be on iteration review. B. Problems that arose > As described in the question, there is definitely something wrong with the last iterations. Seems to be the best answer. C. Solutions that saved the organization the most time and money > Not clear. It can be both delivered items or points selected for improvement on the last retro. D. Problems that were solved > Hard to discuss. It can be both delivered items or points selected for improvement on the last retro.
upvoted 4 times
...
...
zvasanth1
3 years, 2 months ago
A product owner feels that the last sprint failed to sufficiently deliver what was valuable to their organization's overall project goals. What should the scrum master mention at the next retrospective? A. Solutions to project problems that were built into the last sprint B. Problems that arose C. Solutions that saved the organization the most time and money D. Problems that were solved Retrospectives: 1. Inspect how the last Sprint went with regards to people, relationships, process, and tools; 2. Identify and order the major items that went well and potential improvements; and, 3. Create a plan for implementing improvements to the way the Scrum Team does its work. A and C talks about solutions so we can eliminate it D talks about problem that were solved, but last sprint failed only C is remaining
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...