Exam PMI-ACP topic 1 question 30 discussion

question is related to acceptance criteria and test case will be develop based on AC so D is not correct. Answer should be C

The agile practitioner should define the user stories with just enough details so the team can collaborate continuously. This approach aligns with the principles of Agile methodologies, which emphasize collaboration, flexibility, and iterative development.

It is C. D doent address the level of detail issue.

The correct answer is D. The wording of A,b and C is very tricky because they are directing the SM to perform the task. Note, SM never does any of those tasks, SM is there to make an environment in which the responsible does what he/she is supposed to do thereby the option D is the correct answer.

SM not define the user stories himself. 1 vote for D

Test Scenarios to be created by the Team based on the Acceptance Criteria. The answer D assumes that this is Agile Practitioner to create Test Scenarios. Wrong. I vote C.

A. Completing test cases upfront: This can be time-consuming and unnecessary at this stage, potentially delaying backlog refinement and development. Test cases can be further refined as development progresses. B. Defining detailed business requirements: While ensuring alignment with business goals is crucial, focusing solely on detailed requirements at this stage might distract from understanding user needs and hinder agile flexibility. D. Focusing on exhaustive testing scenarios: While incorporating some testing information in acceptance criteria is valuable, including all scenarios upfront can be inefficient and might miss potential edge cases that emerge later.

C is the Correct Answer

C - it has the words just enough (barely enough)

During the backlog grooming session, it is important to ensure that the user stories are well understood by the team. The level of detail in the acceptance criteria should be just enough to facilitate a shared understanding of what is expected of the story. This will allow the team to collaborate continuously and avoid any misunderstandings or assumptions during development.

Question asking level of details so it has to be C

I believe the purpose of grooming is to explain and clearly define user stories and tasks to avoid uncertainty and that's why I would go with C. Just give enough details on the story so the team can move on.

A - wrong. The stories are already created in the backlog, now is the grooming session. Besides that, SM doesn't create anything in the backlog (It's PO job) B - "detailed" is collides with agile. C - same as A D - correct. SM is ensuring.

D sounds right!

I would go with D.

D is the most (as acceptance criteria after user story)

D sure